ReviewJournal of medicine and life2025
Fetal and maternal surveillance in high-risk pregnancy: tools, timing, and trends.
Review in Journal of medicine and life, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- EARLY REASSURANCE OR FALSE SAFETY? THE FETAL HOME DOPPLER USE IN ACTIVE MONITORING IN THE FIRST TRIMESTER OF PREGNANCY - FROM THE ENDOCRINE PERSPECTIVE.Acta endocrinologica (Bucharest, Romania : 2005)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
According to WHO statistics, stillbirths represent an incompletely elucidated, partially neglected problem, resulting in millions of pregnancies per year globally. This phenomenon has a major emotional impact on parents and society, as well as an additional economic effort on the part of health services. Stratification of high-risk pregnancies could be followed by a decrease in perinatal mortality through careful monitoring and possible obstetric interventions in selected cases. Identification of risk factors, assessment of genetic causes, planning of imaging monitoring strategy, cardiotocography, and therapeutic management can contribute to a decrease in the number of stillbirths. In this narrative review, we aimed to assess the current status of fetal and maternal surveillance in high-risk pregnancies and the role of identifying fetal movements associated with the risk of stillbirth. Recommendations for routine monitoring of fetal movement are warranted in high-risk pregnancies, particularly those with placental pathology or small for gestational age (SGA)/FGR (fetal growth restriction) assessed by ultrasound or by analysis of various biomarkers. Current methods for fetal movement counting do not demonstrate high sensitivity and specificity, underscoring the need for further research. Identifying the main risk factors for stillbirth and stratifying fetuses at high risk will contribute to improving mater-nal-fetal outcomes and better management of health system resources.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.