Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41020084›Full record

SynthesisJournal of medicine and life2025

Revolution or routine? Comparing AI and traditional imaging in thoracic surgery outcomes: a systematic review.

Raluca Oltean, Liviu Oltean, Andreea Nelson Twakor, Teodor Horvat

Abstract readSystematic ReviewComparative Study
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of medicine and life, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Raluca OlteanCarol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania.
Liviu OlteanCarol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania.
Andreea Nelson TwakorDepartment of Internal Medicine, County Clinical Emergency Hospital, Constanta, Romania.
Teodor HorvatCarol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) are increasingly pivotal in advancing postoperative imaging for thoracic surgery, presenting transformative potentials in clinical practice. This comprehensive review investigates the current applications and future directions of AI and ML by comparing them with traditional imaging methods. It highlights how these technologies assist in the early detection of postoperative complications such as infections, anastomotic leaks, and pleural effusions through sophisticated image analysis algorithms. The discussion extends to the automation of routine imaging tasks, which not only improves efficiency but also allows radiologists to focus on more complex cases. Looking ahead, the article considers the implications of emerging technologies such as deep learning and neural networks. This further enhances the capabilities of AI in medical imaging. By providing a thorough overview of the current landscape and anticipating future advancements, this article highlights the profound impact of AI and ML on improving patient care and outcomes in thoracic surgery.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceDiagnostic ImagingThoracic Surgical ProceduresHumansMachine LearningPostoperative Complicationsartificial neural networkcomputer-aided diagnosticsdeep learningthoracic surgery

Identifiers

PMID41020084
PMCPMC12467408

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.