ReviewJCO global oncology2025
Adoption and Implementation of Affordable Cancer Technologies in El Salvador: Identifying Implementation Strategies for Successful Cervical Cancer Prevention in Resource-Limited Settings.
Review in JCO global oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
As part of the affordable cancer technology program, our team developed and tested a portable thermal ablation (TA) cervical precancer treatment. This research helped support subsequent implementation of the technology in El Salvador. Here, we review successful implementation strategies deployed during the process and point to challenges and implications for other low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). We use the exploration, preparation, implementation, and sustainment framework to guide the discussion and identify associated implementation strategies used during each phase. Significant strategies were the development and maintenance of multi-actor partnerships and accessing new funding to introduce innovations to the country. In this case, planning for implementation began before the decision to adopt TA. The case of El Salvador highlights the need for such pragmatic approaches to shorten the time between scientific research and clinical practice in LMICs. The impact of these efforts has been significant: El Salvador has gone from one of the countries with the lowest cervical cancer screening rates in the region to one that can potentially meet elimination targets in the coming decades. This experience can serve as a blueprint for cervical cancer control efforts in other LMICs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.