ArticleGesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany))2026
[Relevance of eHealth Literacy (eHL) for health services research and practice - Part II].
Article in Gesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany)), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Not all individuals or population groups can participate equally in digital transformation due to varying levels of (e)HL and their socioeconomic conditions. This disparity is known as the "digital divide." A lower socioeconomic status and older age appear to be associated with lower eHL. In the interest of reducing health inequalities, targeted efforts to promote dGK among disadvantaged groups should be pursued. This paper by the members of the working group Digital Health of the German Network for Health Services Research (Deutsches Netzwerk Versorgungsforschung e.V. (DNVF)) therefore addresses the importance of eHealth Literacy (eHL) for health services research and practice in Germany, with an emphasis on measures to enhance eHL. Building on a theory-based definition of eHL established in the first publication (Relevance of eHealth Literacy (eHL) for health services research and practice - Part I), the current state of eHL in Germany and the effects of low eHL are examined. Guided by the Delphi study conducted by the DNVF working group Digital Health and the guidelines of the German Advisory Council on Health and Care (Sachverständigenrat zur Begutachtung der Entwicklung im Gesundheitswesen und in der Pflege (SVR)), the digital divide is addressed and analyzed. Specific proposals for enhancing eHL are presented, with a focus on theory-driven interventions co-developed with users. Evaluation and implementation aspects of such interventions are also considered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.