Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41022243›Full record

ArticlePhysiology & behavior2025

Central pramlintide administration potently suppresses operant responding for sucrose and locomotor activity in male rats.

Katherine A Kern, Adrianne M DiBrog, Emily Demieri, Johnathan T Przybysz, Stewart D Clark, Elizabeth G Mietlicki-Baase

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physiology & behavior, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Brain Amylin Signaling, Feeding, and Reward.Comprehensive Physiology · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Katherine A KernExercise and Nutrition Sciences, School of Public Health and Health Professions, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY 14214, USA.
Adrianne M DiBrogExercise and Nutrition Sciences, School of Public Health and Health Professions, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY 14214, USA.
Emily DemieriExercise and Nutrition Sciences, School of Public Health and Health Professions, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY 14214, USA.
Johnathan T PrzybyszExercise and Nutrition Sciences, School of Public Health and Health Professions, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY 14214, USA.
Stewart D ClarkPharmacology and Toxicology, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY 14214, USA.
Elizabeth G Mietlicki-BaaseExercise and Nutrition Sciences, School of Public Health and Health Professions, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY 14214, USA; Center for Ingestive Behavior Research, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY 14260, USA. Electronic address: em1@buffalo.edu.

Funding

Effects of mesolimbic amylin signaling on macronutrient intakeR01DK128030 · NIDDK · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI Elizabeth Genevieve Mietlicki-Baase · 2022 to 2026
$1.8M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK128030
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Amylin is a feeding-suppressive hormone which acts centrally in the control of energy balance. Some evidence suggests it reduces motivation for food rewards. Pramlintide is a synthetic amylin analog that is used clinically in the treatment of diabetes, and it also reduces feeding and weight gain. However, the mechanisms behind these pramlintide-induced reductions in feeding are unclear. Here we tested the hypothesis that pramlintide would decrease motivation for a palatable food, sucrose pellets. Results show that peripheral (IP) pramlintide had no effect on progressive ratio responding for sucrose pellets. In contrast, intracerebroventricular (ICV) pramlintide reduced active lever pressing, reinforcers earned, and breakpoint for sucrose, even at lower doses subthreshold for effects on 24 h chow intake and body weight change. However, lever pressing behavior was completely abolished for many rats, raising concern for unexpected motor effects. To test whether central pramlintide impacted locomotor activity, we conducted an open field study and found that ICV pramlintide significantly reduced distance traveled at several timepoints, suggesting suppressed locomotor activity. Overall, our results suggest that peripheral pramlintide does not affect motivation for sucrose, and that although central pramlintide does reduce outcomes assessing motivation, this may be confounded by a concurrent reduction in locomotor activity.

Indexed as

Conditioning, OperantHypoglycemic AgentsIslet Amyloid PolypeptideMotor ActivitySucroseAnimalsBody WeightDose-Response Relationship, DrugEatingInjections, IntraventricularMaleMotivationRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyHypoglycemic AgentsIslet Amyloid PolypeptidepramlintideSucroseAmylinDiabetesIAPPMotivationObesityReward

Identifiers

PMID41022243
PMCPMC12614640

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.