ArticleExperimental physiology2026
Maximal strength and voluntary activation of adductor pollicis after a single session of acute intermittent hypercapnia or acute intermittent hypoxia.
Article in Experimental physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Acute intermittent hypoxia (AIH) can increase maximal strength of limb muscles in people with incomplete spinal cord injury (SCI), but it is mostly untested in people without SCI. Acute intermittent hypercapnia (AIC) may engage similar respiratory circuits to AIH, but the effects of AIC on human limb motor output are unknown. We examined whether single sessions of AIH or AIC improved motor output to a hand muscle in neurologically intact people. Twelve adults completed a single 30-min session of AIH (breathing alternate 1-min low oxygen air and 1-min normal air), AIC (alternate 1-min high carbon dioxide air and 1-min normal air), or SHAM (normal air). At baseline and for 80 min post-intervention, participants performed repeated isometric maximal voluntary thumb adductions. Transcranial magnetic stimulation elicited motor evoked potentials (MEPs) from first dorsal interosseous and adductor pollicis at each time point. Generalised linear mixed models were compared between conditions (AIH, AIC, SHAM). Normalised to baseline, voluntary activation was higher after AIC than SHAM (5.9%, P < 0.001) and AIH (5.5%, P < 0.001); MVC force was higher after AIC than SHAM (7.7%, P < 0.001), whereas maximal EMG was higher after AIH than SHAM (14.3%, P < 0.001). MEPs and maximal M-waves did not differ between conditions for either muscle (P > 0.25). Thus, single sessions of AIC induced small motor output improvements in people without SCI, but AIH did not. AIC increased maximal voluntary activation, but the mechanisms for this remain unclear because the MEPs provided no evidence for corticospinal facilitation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.