ArticleScientific reports2025
Mimed speech as an intermediary state between overt and imagined speech production in an electrocorticography study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Developing decoders for imagined speech is crucial for individuals unable to produce audible speech, yet this process is challenging due to the lack of verifiable reference. This limitation highlights the need for innovative approaches to imagined speech decoding that can leverage the available verifiable reference from other types of speech production. To address this challenge, it is essential to understand the relationships between overt, mimed, and imagined speech. In our study, we utilized electrocorticography (ECoG) to examine neural correlates and decoder performance across these speech types during speech preparation. We observed high gamma activity (HGA) diverged earlier in the left hemisphere than in the right, suggesting an early stage of information processing for speech production. Also, HGA in overt and mimed speech showed similarity in the precentral and postcentral gyri, peaking at the end of speech preparation. In contrast, mimed and imagined speech demonstrated similarities in the superior temporal gyrus earlier in the process, also in HGA. These findings indicate that mimed speech shares neural signals with both overt and imagined speech in distinct spatial and temporal aspects, facilitating the development of imagined speech decoders for speech-impaired individuals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.