ArticleScientific reports2025
Validity and reliability of 3D automatic ultrasound imaging for measuring coronal and sagittal angles in idiopathic scoliosis.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- State-of-the-art review in AI and digital technologies for spine deformity.Spine deformity · 2026Review
- Radiation-free Assessment of Scoliosis: A Reliability and Validity Study for Ultrasound Angles.Global spine journal · 2026Article
- Vertebra-Level Completeness Analysis in Thoracolumbar Ultrasound Using a YOLO-Based Detection Framework.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Patients with idiopathic scoliosis require regular radiation-less follow-up such as ultrasound. Automated labeling reduces traditional ultrasound manual labeling errors. We enrolled 80 patients with idiopathic scoliosis between February 2024 and June 2024. We evaluated both intra- and inter-operator reliability of the ultrasound curve angle (UCA) and ultrasound lamina angle (USLA) and compared three-dimensional ultrasound assessments with conventional X-ray imaging to evaluate the validity and reliability of ultrasound measurements (UCA and USLA) against established radiographic benchmarks, including Cobb angle, thoracic kyphosis, and lumbar lordosis. Reliability assessments were conducted using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The validity of the UCA and USLA measurements was rigorously analyzed by comparing them against established radiographic benchmarks using Pearson correlation coefficients and Bland-Altman plots. ICC analyses confirmed robust ultrasound measurement reliability. Validity evaluations revealed a pronounced linear correlation between the UCA and coronal Cobb angle. Bland-Altman plots showed a strong correlation between ultrasound and radiologic measurements in the coronal plane. Automated ultrasound represents a promising diagnostic tool for monitoring conservative treatments in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.