Evidence mapPaperPMID 41023089Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Glucodensity functional profiles outperform traditional continuous glucose monitoring metrics.

Marcos Matabuena, Rahul Ghosal, Javier Enrique Aguilar, Ayya Keshet, Robert Wagner, Carmen Fernández Merino, Juan Sánchez Castro, Vadim Zipunnikov, Jukka-Pekka Onnela, Francisco Gude

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Anaglycemia and Cataglycemia: Proposed Terminology for Glucose Dynamics.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Marcos MatabuenaDepartment of Biostatistics, Harvard University, Cambridge, USA. mmatabuena@hsph.harvard.edu.
Rahul GhosalDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of South Carolina, Columbia, USA.
Javier Enrique AguilarTU Dortmund, Dortmund, Germany.
Ayya KeshetDepartment of Computer Science and Applied Mathematics, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel.
Robert WagnerDepartment of Endocrinology and Diabetology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Moorenstr. 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Carmen Fernández MerinoPrimary Care Center, A Estrada, Santiago, Spain.
Juan Sánchez CastroPrimary Care Center, A Estrada, Santiago, Spain.
Vadim ZipunnikovDepartment of Biostatistics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, USA.
Jukka-Pekka OnnelaDepartment of Biostatistics, Harvard University, Cambridge, USA.
Francisco GudeDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario, Santiago, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) data have revolutionized the management of type 1 diabetes, particularly when integrated with insulin pumps to mitigate clinical events such as hypoglycemia. Recently, there has been growing interest in utilizing CGM devices in clinical studies involving healthy and diabetic populations. However, efficiently exploiting the high temporal resolution of CGM profiles remains a significant challenge. Numerous indices-such as time-in-range metrics and glucose variability measures-have been proposed, but evidence suggests these metrics overlook critical aspects of dynamic glucose homeostasis. As an alternative method, this paper explores the clinical value of glucodensity metrics in capturing glucose dynamics-specifically the speed and acceleration of CGM time series-as new biomarkers for predicting long-term glucose outcomes. Our results demonstrate significant information gains, exceeding 20 % in terms of adjusted r-square, in forecasting glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and fasting plasma glucose (FPG) at five and eight years from baseline AEGIS data, compared to traditional non-CGM and CGM glucose biomarkers. These findings underscore the importance of incorporating more complex CGM functional metrics, such as the glucodensity approach, to fully capture continuous glucose fluctuations across different time-scales.

Indexed as

Blood GlucoseBlood Glucose Self-MonitoringDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1AdultBiomarkersContinuous Glucose MonitoringFemaleGlycated HemoglobinHumansMaleMiddle AgedBiomarkersBlood GlucoseGlycated HemoglobinContinuos glucose monitoringDigital healthFunctional data analysisGlucose dynamicGlucose matabolism

Identifiers

PMID41023089
PMCPMC12480968

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.