Evidence mapPaperPMID 41023258Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Nephrologists' perception of the French national guidelines in nephrology.

Latame Komla Adoli, Cécile Vigneau, Arnaud Campeon, Cécile Couchoud, Valérie Chatelet, Thierry Lobbedez, Eric Daugas, Florian Bayer, Elsa Vabret, Jean-Philippe Jais and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Latame Komla AdoliUniv Rennes, Ehesp, Cnrs, Inserm, Arènes - Umr 6051, Rsms - U1309, 35000, Rennes, France. latame.adoli@ehesp.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4670-2668
Cécile VigneauUniv Rennes, Chu Rennes, Inserm, Ehesp, Irset (Institut de Recherche en Santé, Environnement Et Travail) - Umr_s 1085, 35000, Rennes, France.
Arnaud CampeonArènes-UMR 6051, ISSAV, EHESP, CNRS, 35000, Rennes, France.
Cécile CouchoudRenal Epidemiology and Information Network (REIN) Registry, Biomedecine Agency, Saint-Denis-La-Plaine, France.
Valérie ChateletU1086 Inserm, Anticipe, Centre De Lutte Contre Le Cancer François Baclesse, Centre Universitaire Des Maladies Rénales, Caen, France.
Thierry LobbedezU1086 Inserm, Anticipe, Centre De Lutte Contre Le Cancer François Baclesse, Centre Universitaire Des Maladies Rénales, Caen, France.
Eric DaugasInserm U1149 Université Paris Cité, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Service De Néphrologie, Hôpital Bichat, Paris, France.
Florian BayerRenal Epidemiology and Information Network (REIN) Registry, Biomedecine Agency, Saint-Denis-La-Plaine, France.
Elsa VabretUniv Rennes, Ehesp, Cnrs, Inserm, Arènes - Umr 6051, Rsms - U1309, 35000, Rennes, France.
Jean-Philippe JaisBiostatistics Unit, Necker-Enfants Malades Hospital, AP-HP, Imagine Institute, Université Paris-Cité, Paris, France.
Sahar Bayat-MakoeiUniv Rennes, Ehesp, Cnrs, Inserm, Arènes - Umr 6051, Rsms - U1309, 35000, Rennes, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In France, the "Haute Autorité de Santé" (HAS), an independent public scientific authority, regularly publishes guidelines targeted to healthcare professionals. As their implementation is left to the healthcare professionals' discretion, their perception could influence their application. The aim of this study was to assess the nephrologists' perception of the HAS guidelines on nephrology in general and on the access to the kidney transplant waiting list. We used a mixed methods approach with an exploratory design combining analysis of qualitative and quantitative data. Nephrologists practicing in France were included. We collected qualitative data in face-to-face semi-structured interviews and identified the main themes through an inductive thematic analysis. We collected quantitative data through an online questionnaire designed based on the qualitative findings. The analysis of interviews with 45 nephrologists (22 women) identified three main themes: (i) nephrologists' knowledge and sources of information on HAS guidelines in nephrology; (ii) their perception of these guidelines and relevance to medical practice; (iii) age limit to access the kidney transplant waiting list in the 2015 guidelines. The quantitative analysis included 126 nephrologists (47.6% women), among whom 84.1% had already heard about these guidelines. Respectively, 85.8% and 80.2% found the guidelines "clear" and "complete". Overall, the quantitative data confirmed the qualitative findings. This study shows how nephrologists perceive the HAS guidelines. This will inform discussions on how to make these guidelines more accessible to nephrologists. New studies could be carried out to better quantify and qualify the effect of these guidelines.

Indexed as

NephrologistsNephrologyPractice Guidelines as TopicAdultAttitude of Health PersonnelFemaleFranceHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansKidney TransplantationMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesWaiting ListsGuidelinesMixed methodsNephrologyPerception

Identifiers

PMID41023258
PMCPMC12480626

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.