ArticleScientific reports2025
Machine learning-based models for screening of anemia and leukemia using features of complete blood count reports.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Routine Laboratory-Based Machine Learning for Discriminating Multiple Myeloma from Clinical Mimickers: Development and Internal Validation of a Diagnostic Prediction Model.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Prediction of Anemia in Adenomyosis Patients Using Transvaginal Ultrasound Radiomics.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Cultural validation of the RCADS and use of ensemble learning for symptom profiling of anxiety and depression.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Complete blood count (CBC) report features are routinely used to screen a wide array of hematological disorders. However, the complexity of disease overlap increases the probability of neglecting the underlying patterns between these features, and the heterogeneity associated with the subjective assessment of CBC reports often lead to random clinical testing. Such disease prediction analyses can be enhanced by the incorporation of machine learning (ML) algorithms for efficient handling of CBC features. Hybrid synthetic data are generated based on the statistical distribution of features to overcome the constraint of small sample size (N = 287). To the extent of our knowledge, our study is the first to employ hybrid synthetic data for modeling hematological parameters. Six ML models i.e., decision tree, random forest, support vector machine, logistic regression, gradient boosting machine, and multilayer perceptron are tested for disease prediction. This research presents ML-based models for the screening of two common blood disorders - anemia and leukemia, using CBC report features. A 'fingerprint' of 14 out of 21 features based on both statistical and clinical relevance is selected for model development. Exceptional performance has been observed by the random forest algorithm with 98% accuracy and 97, 98, 99, and 2% macro-averages of precision, recall, specificity, and miss-rate respectively for all classes. However, external validation of the model reveal poor generalizability on a different demographic dataset, as the model obtained an accuracy of 74%. The proposed methodology may serve as an efficient support system for the screening of anemia and leukemia. However, extensive optimization with regards to its generalizability are warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.