Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41023747›Full record

SynthesisStem cell research & therapy2025

Efficacy and safety of mesenchymal stem/stromal cells and their derived extracellular vesicles for acute respiratory distress syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Yaxin Wu, Ruonan Xu, Yuanyuan Li, Kai Liu, Tao Yang, Ming Shi, Fu-Sheng Wang, Zhe Xu

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Stem cell research & therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yaxin WuSenior Department of Infectious Diseases, Chinese PLA General Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Infectious Diseases, Beijing, China.
Ruonan XuSenior Department of Infectious Diseases, Chinese PLA General Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Infectious Diseases, Beijing, China.
Yuanyuan LiSenior Department of Infectious Diseases, Chinese PLA General Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Infectious Diseases, Beijing, China.
Kai LiuSenior Department of Infectious Diseases, Chinese PLA General Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Infectious Diseases, Beijing, China.
Tao YangSenior Department of Infectious Diseases, Chinese PLA General Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Infectious Diseases, Beijing, China.
Ming ShiSenior Department of Infectious Diseases, Chinese PLA General Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Infectious Diseases, Beijing, China.
Fu-Sheng WangSenior Department of Infectious Diseases, Chinese PLA General Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Infectious Diseases, Beijing, China. fswang302@163.com.
Zhe XuSenior Department of Infectious Diseases, Chinese PLA General Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Infectious Diseases, Beijing, China. xuzhe302@139.com.

Funding

the National Key Research and Development Plan 2022YFC2304803the National Key Research and Development Program of China 2022YFC2304404
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough numerous clinical trials have explored stem cell-based therapies for acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), their findings are inconsistent. This meta-analysis aimed to comprehensively evaluate the efficacy and safety of stem cell-based therapies, including mesenchymal stem/stromal cells (MSCs) and their derived extracellular vesicles (EVs), in the treatment of ARDS.

methodsA comprehensive literature search of the Cochrane Library, PubMed, and Web of Science databases and the US National Institutes of Health Trials Registry (ClinicalTrials.gov) was conducted to identify eligible studies assessing the efficacy and safety of stem cell-based therapies in ARDS. The primary outcomes included all-cause mortality within or over one month, adverse events (AEs), and serious adverse events (SAEs). To explore possible bias, subgroup analysis was performed based on the design of study (randomized controlled trial vs. nonrandomized interventional trial), etiology of ARDS, type of stem cell-based therapy, and times of infusion. Relative risk (RR) and mean difference (MD) were calculated to evaluate efficacy and safety. This study was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42024593740).

resultsA total of 48 studies involving 1,773 patients were eligible, of which 31 studies were included in the meta-analysis. The results revealed a significant reduction in all-cause mortality among patients receiving MSCs or their derived EVs and secretomes compared to those receiving routine therapy (RR = 0.74, 95% CI = 0.63-0.87, p = 0.0003, I²=5%). This effect was only seen in all-cause mortality within one month (RR = 0.74, 95% CI = 0.62-0.89, p = 0.002, I²=0%); furthermore, high dose MSCs (over 1 × 10

conclusionsStem cell-based therapy significantly reduced mortality within one month and was well tolerated in ARDS patients. Given the limited sample size of included studies, the efficacy of stem cell-based therapy in patients with ARDS needs to be validated in further larger and more rigorous randomized controlled trials.

Indexed as

Extracellular VesiclesMesenchymal Stem CellsMesenchymal Stem Cell TransplantationRespiratory Distress SyndromeHumansAll-cause mortalityEfficacyExtracellular vesiclesMesenchymal stem cellsSafety

Identifiers

PMID41023747
PMCPMC12481956

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.