ArticleBMC microbiology2025
An immunoinformatics-based designed multi-epitope candidate vaccine against Mycoplasma pneumoniae.
Article in BMC microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- In Silico Design and Characterization of a Multi-Epitope Vaccine Candidate AgainstMicroorganisms · 2026Article
- Immunoinformatic-driven design of a multi-epitope vaccine againstBiochemistry and biophysics reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMycoplasma pneumoniae is a common cause of respiratory infections, and the emergence of antibiotic resistance underscores the need for an effective vaccine. This study employed an in silico approach to design a multi-epitope vaccine using genomic data from M. pneumoniae.
methodsCandidate antigens were screened based on antigenicity, allergenicity, and toxicity. A non-allergenic, non-toxic antigen was selected to design a construct comprising B-cell and T-cell epitopes, fused with the cholera toxin B subunit as an adjuvant and connected via immunologically favorable linkers. The construct was evaluated through molecular docking, molecular dynamics simulations, binding free energy calculations (MM/GBSA), immune simulation, codon optimization, and in silico cloning.
resultsThe vaccine showed strong binding to TLR4 with a predicted binding energy of − 21.7 kcal/mol. Structural validation yielded a ProSA Z-score of − 5.71, an ERRAT score of 84.188%, and 98.7% of residues in favored or allowed regions of the Ramachandran plot. Immune simulations indicated elevated IFN-γ and antibody levels, and population coverage analysis showed global HLA representation of 50.69%.
conclusionsThe final vaccine construct demonstrated structural stability, strong immune receptor interactions, and broad population coverage in silico, supporting its potential efficacy against M. pneumoniae and warranting further experimental validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.