ReviewWorld journal of stem cells2025
Stem cell-based cartilage regeneration: Biological strategies, engineering innovations, and clinical translation.
Review in World journal of stem cells, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Immunity-and-matrix-regulatory cells promote hyaline-like cartilage repair in osteoarthritis.Bioactive materials · 2026Article
- Review
- Natural Biomaterials for Osteochondral Repair: From Source to Strategy.Advanced healthcare materials · 2026Review
- Mesenchymal stromal cells therapy for remodeling the joint microenvironment: mechanisms, nanotechnology-enhanced strategies, and translation prospects.Stem cell research & therapy · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Articular cartilage damage caused by trauma or degenerative diseases such as osteoarthritis remains a major therapeutic challenge due to the tissue's limited regenerative capacity. Traditional surgical interventions-including microfracture, autologous chondrocyte implantation, and osteochondral grafting-often result in the formation of biomechanically inferior fibrocartilage and fail to restore long-term joint function. In contrast, stem cell-based strategies have emerged as a promising approach for regenerating hyaline-like cartilage by combining the biological potential of mesenchymal stem cells and induced pluripotent stem cells with advances in tissue engineering. This review synthesizes the current understanding of cartilage structure and repair limitations, evaluates the regenerative potential of various stem cell sources, and highlights engineering innovations such as bioactive scaffolds, controlled growth factor delivery, and three-dimensional bioprinting. We also examine key preclinical studies and early-phase clinical trials demonstrating the safety and efficacy of stem cell-based therapies. Finally, we explore future directions, including gene editing, exosome-based therapeutics, and personalized regenerative strategies, that may address remaining translational barriers. Collectively, stem cell-centered approaches offer a transformative avenue toward durable, functional cartilage repair and hold strong potential for clinical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.