Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41026065›Full record

ArticleNeuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society2025

Correlation of Electrical Impedance and Evoked Potentials With Properties of the Electrode Interface Using in Situ Block-Face Imaging of the Rat Pelvic Nerve.

Sophie C Payne, Christopher Bowman, Janet R Keast, Ella P Trang, Peregrine B Osborne, James B Fallon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sophie C PayneBionics Institute, Fitzroy, Australia; Medical Bionics Department, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Christopher BowmanBionics Institute, Fitzroy, Australia.
Janet R KeastDepartment of Anatomy and Physiology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Ella P TrangBionics Institute, Fitzroy, Australia; Medical Bionics Department, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Peregrine B OsborneDepartment of Anatomy and Physiology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
James B FallonBionics Institute, Fitzroy, Australia; Medical Bionics Department, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; Department of Otolaryngology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia. Electronic address: jfallon@bionicsinstitute.org.

Funding

Understanding functional connectivity of sensory and motor pathways to specific regions of the lower urinary tract.OT2OD023872 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE · PI KEAST, JANET R · 2016 to 2021
$5.3M
NIH HHS OT2 OD023872
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundElectrical stimulation is an emerging therapy for urologic disorders. The interface between electrode and neural tissue is a critical region of interest given it affects thresholds of neural activation. Measures of electrode impedance are used clinically to estimate tissue fibrosis at the interface; however, the relationship between impedance and fibrosis is not well defined.

objectiveThis study aimed to assess the relationship between interface tissue fibrosis and nerve distance from electrode surface with measurements of impedance and evoked thresholds using a chronic model of visceral nerve implantation. MATERIALS AND

methodsAn extraneural four-platinum electrode array was implanted on the rat (N = 14) pelvic nerve and measured common ground impedance, transimpedance, and electrically evoked neural thresholds during two weeks of implantation. A novel serial block-face staining and imaging technique was used to assess the electrode-nerve interface in situ.

resultsAnalysis revealed no significant correlations between impedance or neural threshold and fibrotic tissue area (p > 0.05). Proximal electrodes 1 and 2 were significantly further away from neural tissue than were distal electrodes 3 and 4 (p < 0.011). Despite this, there were no differences in neural thresholds among electrode configurations (p > 0.05).

conclusionMeasurements of electrode impedance and neural thresholds indicate the presence but not the absolute amount of interface tissue fibrosis. Understanding the dynamics of the nerve-electrode interface is essential for designing suitable peripheral nerve electrode arrays and informing on stimulation parameters to advance the future clinical use of pelvic nerve stimulation as a neuromodulation therapy in urologic disorders.

Indexed as

Electric ImpedanceElectrodes, ImplantedEvoked PotentialsPelvisAnimalsElectric StimulationFibrosisMaleRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyChronic in vivo recordingelectrical impedancegrinding histology methodperipheral nerve interface

Identifiers

PMID41026065
PMCPMC12672018

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.