Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41028046›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Batch Bayesian auto-tuning for nonlinear Kalman estimators.

Cristovao Freitas Iglesias, Miodrag Bolic

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Cristovao Freitas IglesiasSchool of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science (EECS), University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, K1N 6N5, Canada. cfrei096@uottawa.ca.
Miodrag BolicSchool of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science (EECS), University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, K1N 6N5, Canada.

Funding

National Research Council Canada AI4D-103-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The optimal performance of nonlinear Kalman estimators (NKEs) depends on properly tuning five key components: process noise covariance, measurement noise covariance, initial state noise covariance, initial state conditions, and dynamic model parameters. However, the traditional auto-tuning approaches based on normalized estimation error squared or normalized innovation squared cannot efficiently estimate all NKE components because they rely on ground truth state models (usually unavailable) or on a subset of measured data used to compute the innovation errors. Furthermore, manual tuning is labor-intensive and prone to errors. In this work, we introduce an approach called batch Bayesian auto-tuning (BAT) for NKEs. This novel approach enables using all available measured data (not just those selected for generating innovation errors) during the tuning process of all NKE components. This is done by defining a comprehensive posterior distribution of all NKE components given all available measured data outside of the NKE recursive process based on the equivalence between the posterior distributions used in batch and recursive Bayesian inference. Our empirical validation on a synthetic bioprocess dataset demonstrates that BAT significantly improves the consistency and accuracy of NKE estimations compared to baseline methods. These findings indicate that BAT can effectively optimize NKE tuning, improving performance and reliability in practical applications.

Identifiers

PMID41028046
PMCPMC12485023

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.