ArticleAngiogenesis2025
Myocardial infarction induces endothelial dysfunction with independence of cardiovascular risk factors.
Article in Angiogenesis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prognostic impact of right ventricular dilatation and echocardiography use criteria in hospitalized COVID-19 patients.World journal of methodology · 2026Article
- The Role and Mechanism of Endothelial Progenitor Cell-Derived Extracellular Vesicles in Vascular Repair of Ischemic Heart Disease.Journal of cardiovascular translational research · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimsEndothelial dysfunction and impaired angiogenesis are hallmarks of ischemic heart disease and critical determinants of adverse cardiovascular outcomes after myocardial infarction (MI). While conventional cardiovascular risk factors (CVRFs) are known contributors, the specific role of MI itself triggering endothelial dysfunction remains unclear. This study aims to assess the direct impact of MI on endothelial function, independent of cardiovascular risk factors, using human and porcine endothelial colony-forming cells (ECFCs) as a surrogate cellular model. METHODS AND
resultsHuman ECFCs (hECFCs) were isolated from the peripheral blood of healthy volunteers (Control-hECFCs, n = 6), patients immediately after MI (AMI-hECFCs, n = 6), and patients 6 months after MI (CMI-hECFCs, n = 6). To evaluate the direct effect of MI independently of CVRFs, a porcine model was used: healthy pigs (n = 6) underwent 90 min of myocardial ischemia by coronary balloon occlusion followed by reperfusion. Porcine ECFCs (pECFCs) were isolated before MI (Control-pECFCs) and one month after MI (CMI-pECFCs, n = 6). In vitro, CMI-hECFCs and CMI-pECFCs had delayed colony formation, whereas AMI-hECFCs did not. Morphological alterations were observed in AMI-hECFCs and CMI-hECFCs (area and shape), while only shape changes were found in CMI-pECFCs. Senescence was increased in AMI-hECFCs and CMI-hECFCs, but not in CMI-pECFCs. Elevated oxidative stress was only detected in CMI-hECFCs. Functional angiogenic and proliferative capacities were reduced in AMI-hECFCs, CMI-hECFCs and CMI-pECFCs; however, only CMI-hECFCs and CMI-pECFCs displayed impaired migration. Molecular analysis showed overactivation of the MSK2/MKK3/p53 signalling axis in dysfunctional ECFCs, while synergistic inhibition of the axis partially restored ECFC function.
conclusionsMI induces sustained ECFC dysfunction independently of cardiovascular risk factors. Targeting the MSK2/MKK3/p53 pathway may be a promising therapeutic strategy to restore endothelial function and improve angiogenesis after MI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41028611What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.