ArticlePharmacology research & perspectives2025
The Use of Proton Pump Inhibitors Among Adults in Norway-A Nationwide Drug Utilization Study.
Article in Pharmacology research & perspectives, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Use of Proton Pump Inhibitors Among Adults in Norway-A Nationwide Drug Utilization Study.Pharmacology research & perspectives · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) has increased in Western countries over several decades, and there is concern about unsubstantiated indications and effects of long-term use. The study aimed to describe the prevalence, incidence, indications, and prescription pattern for PPIs over the past decade in an entire national cohort. This nationwide drug utilization study used data from the Norwegian Prescription Database and Norwegian Patient Registry. Patterns of PPI use were investigated from 2009 to 2022. Prevalent, long-term, and incident PPI use were calculated. The indication for PPI was defined by the diagnosis code linked to each prescription. Upper endoscopies during the study period were assessed for incident PPI users. PPI prescription increased from 58.1 mill DDD in 2009 to 166.9 mill DDD in 2022, that is, 43 and 106 DDD/1000 inhabitants/day. Prevalent PPI use increased from 3.5% to 9.9%, paralleling an increased incidence from 2.9% to 5.4%. The dominant indications in 2009 and 2022 were esophageal disease in primary care (72.5% and 57.6% of total DDDs) and GERD in specialist care (10.7% and 4.7% of total DDDs). Musculoskeletal disorders, pain, and ulcer prophylaxis all increased during the period. Upper endoscopy around incident PPI use decreased from 25.3% to 11.1%. In conclusion, the 2.46-fold increase in prevalent PPI use was caused by an absolute increase in PPI prescribed against esophageal disease and GERD, and prophylaxis in patients using ulcerogenic comedication, mainly prescribed in primary care. The findings may help inform strategies to reduce a probable overuse of PPIs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.