ArticleNutrition & metabolism2025
Association of monocyte-to-high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol ratio level with risk of severe abdominal aortic calcification: a large cross-sectional study based on NHANES.
Article in Nutrition & metabolism, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveOur research aimed to investigate the relationship between the monocyte-to-high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol ratio (MHR) and the risk of severe abdominal aortic calcification (SAAC).
methodsWe conducted a cross-sectional study using data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2013–2014. We further performed multivariable logistic regression analysis, restricted cubic spline (RCS) plots, and subgroup analysis to study the relationship between the MHR and the risk of SAAC.
resultsA total of 3017 participants were included in this study. After complete adjustment for potential confounders, the incidence of SAAC increased with the higher quartile of MHR (P <0.001). According to the RCS plot, a positive non-linear was the relationship between the MHR and SAAC risk, and the incidence of SAAC increased with the increase of MHR.
conclusionThere was a positive non-linear correlation between the MHR and SAAC in US adults. Our findings imply that close monitoring and adequate control of the MHR has the potential to improve SAAC prevention in the general population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.