Evidence mapPaperPMID 41029611Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2025

Matching implementation strategies to barriers and facilitators for a lifestyle front office in the hospital: a qualitative study.

Marlinde Lianne van Dijk, Joyce Vrijsen, Leonie Mariëlle Te Loo, Inge van den Akker-Scheek, Martine de Bruijne, Rienk Dekker, Willem van Mechelen, Femke van Nassau, Judith G M Jelsma, LOFIT consortium.

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Marlinde Lianne van DijkDepartment of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam UMC, Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. m.l.vandijk@amsterdamumc.nl.
Joyce VrijsenDepartment of Orthopaedics, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Leonie Mariëlle Te LooDepartment of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam UMC, Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Inge van den Akker-ScheekDepartment of Orthopaedics, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Martine de BruijneDepartment of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam UMC, Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Rienk DekkerDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Willem van MechelenDepartment of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam UMC, Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Femke van NassauDepartment of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam UMC, Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Judith G M JelsmaDepartment of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam UMC, Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
LOFIT consortium.

Funding

ZonMw 555003208
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn Dutch hospitals, advice on healthy lifestyle during consultation with healthcare professionals is hindered by limited time, insufficient skills and limited knowledge on referral options. In order to organize a new care pathway in which care related to healthy lifestyle is provided through a dedicated lifestyle front office (LFO) in the hospital, implementation barriers and facilitators were identified and matched to tailored implementation strategies.

methodsSemi-structured interviews were held between March and August 2021 with healthcare professionals (i.e. specialists, physician assistants, dieticians, physiotherapist, (specialized) nurses) from different clinical departments (n = 33), and with patients (n = 27) diagnosed with a non-communicable disease (NCD) that were treated in out-patient clinics of the hospital and had a body mass index of 25 ≥ kg/m

resultsBarriers and facilitators were clustered according to different organizational stages of the identified care pathway. Referral to LFO includes six topics: healthcare professionals' beliefs about lifestyle; patient motivation for lifestyle change; referral skills and knowledge of healthcare professionals; digital resource support for referral; feedback after referral; and responsibility for referral. Appointment at LFO was affected by six topics: financial burden of the additional visit; time, skills and knowledge of lifestyle broker; physical location of LFO; efficiency in care planning; fragmentation; and prevention as task of the general practitioner. Regarding referral to community-based lifestyle initiatives four barriers were identified: financial burden of community-based lifestyle initiative; geographical availability; quality assurance of community-based lifestyle initiatives; and collaboration. Implementation strategies included building an infrastructure, creating a learning collaborative, preparing a referral tool, identifying local champions, informing stakeholders, conducting training, building a coalition, collecting testimonials and accessing new funding.

conclusionsInsights from the current qualitative study were based on a large and diverse stakeholder group and provided important insights for the implementation of an LFO in the hospital. Future research should provide information on effectiveness of actual implementation of the implementation strategies in an LFO in the hospital.

Indexed as

Health PersonnelHealthy LifestyleAdultAttitude of Health PersonnelFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicLife StyleMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandsNoncommunicable DiseasesQualitative ResearchReferral and ConsultationBehavioural changeHospitalImplementationLifestyle front officePreventionQualitative

Identifiers

PMID41029611
PMCPMC12482734

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.