ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2025
Composition of cardiac-derived extracellular vesicles changes with vesicle origin and determines uptake.
Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Extracellular Vesicles in Cardiovascular Disease: Intercellular Signaling, Liquid Biopsy Biomarkers, and Therapeutic Translation.Circulation research · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is a leading cause of mortality worldwide. The potency of cell-based therapies for CVD is increasingly attributed to the release of small extracellular vesicles (sEVs) which consist of a lipid/protein membrane and encapsulate nucleic cargo. Specifically, sEVs from ckit + progenitor cells (CPCs) and mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) are shown to be pro-reparative, with clinical trials conducted. Despite copious research into sEV cargo, the role of parent cell type on sEV membrane composition and its effects on sEV uptake mechanism by recipient cells remain unclear. This is crucial for designing sEV-based therapeutics as uptake mechanism dictates the functionality of the cargo. Methods: In this study we investigate the role of sEV parent cell and membrane composition on the mechanism of EV uptake by recipient cells. Results: We find that sEV membrane lipid and protein composition varies by parent cell type. Further, vesicle uptake mechanism varies by both sEV parent cell type and recipient cell type, with clathrin-mediated uptake being the most variable across parent cell conditions. Using a partial least squares regression model, we observe that proteins important in clathrin-mediated uptake (e.g., TPM1, MRC2, FSTL1, LTBP1) are dissimilar to other vesicle uptake mechanisms. Discussion: This work underscores the importance of the sEV source and membrane composition on uptake, and in turn the importance of selecting specific sEVs based on the target recipient cells for CVD therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.