ArticleBioinformatics advances2025
DeepEPI: CNN-transformer-based model for extracting TF interactions through predicting enhancer-promoter interactions.
Article in Bioinformatics advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Epigenetic research methods and animal models for intervertebral disc degeneration (Review).Molecular medicine reports · 2026Review
- Sharing approaches in predictive genomics across animals, plants and humans.Nature genetics · 2026Review
- ETNet: an interpretable transformer framework for enhancer-enhancer interaction prediction with cross-context transferability.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Motivation: We introduce DeepEPI, a deep learning framework for studying enhancer-promoter interactions (EPIs) directly from genomic sequences. By integrating convolutional neural networks (CNNs) with Transformer blocks, DeepEPI captures the complex regulatory interplay between enhancers and promoters, a key factor in gene expression and disease mechanisms. The model emphasizes interpretability and efficiency by employing embedding layers for OneHot encoding and multihead attention for detecting and analyzing transcription factor (TF) interactions. A DNA2Vec-based version of DeepEPI is also evaluated. Results: DeepEPI is assessed in two dimensions: comparison with existing models and analysis of encoding methods. Across six cell lines, DeepEPI consistently outperforms prior approaches. Compared to EPIVAN, it achieves a 2.4% gain in area under the precision-recall curve (AUPR) and maintains AUROC with DNA2Vec encoding, while with OneHot encoding it shows a 4% increase in AUPR and 1.9% in AUROC. Regarding encoding, DNA2Vec provides higher accuracy, but our OneHot-based embedding balances competitive performance with interpretability and reduced storage requirements. Beyond prediction, DeepEPI enhances biological insight by extracting meaningful TF-TF interactions from attention heads, effectively narrowing the search space for experimental validation. Validation analyses further support the biological relevance of these findings, underscoring DeepEPI's value for advancing EPI research. Availability and implementation: The source code of DeepEPI is available at: https://github.com/nazanintbtb/DeepEPI.git.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.