ArticleClinical case reports2025
Reactive Balance Control Following Selective Dorsal Rhizotomy in Child With Diplegic Cerebral Palsy.
Article in Clinical case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cerebral palsy (CP) is the most common motor disability in early childhood characterized by impaired selective motor control. Children with CP often exhibit delayed and disorganized muscle activation in response to external perturbations, resulting in a high incidence of falls and decreased participation in activities compared with their peers. We examined changes in reactive balance control post-selective dorsal rhizotomy (SDR) in a child with CP in which the major goal of this surgery is to reduce lower extremity spasticity. A 7-year-old girl with spastic diplegic CP (Gross Motor Function Classification System II) participated. Along with clinical evaluations, we employed computerized dynamic posturography to quantify changes in reactive balance control post-SDR, including the Motor Control Test and the Adaptation Test to simulate unexpected perturbations and assess the child's reactive balance control. Post-surgery evaluations indicated improved symmetry in lower extremity weight bearing, particularly in response to forward perturbations. No falls were observed post-surgery in conditions that previously caused imbalance. However, the latency response times to perturbations were longer than in typically developing peers, and the child's force to overcome induced sway was larger than her peers. Although SDR effectively decreased spasticity in our participant, it did not address other factors like soft tissue contractures, muscle weakness, and fixed biomechanical alignment constraints that contributed to balance issues in CP. To our knowledge, this is the first work that demonstrates such limitations post-SDR. The limited tools available to clinicians to assess reactive balance control in children with CP highlight the need for more effective measurements. This case report sheds light on the importance of targeted clinical approaches to enhance reactive balance control post-SDR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.