ArticleThe Journal of physiology2026
A deep learning-enabled toolkit for the 3D segmentation of ventricular cardiomyocytes.
Article in The Journal of physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- CLARISA: Connexin-43 Lateralization Automated ROI-Based Image Signal Analyzer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Mechanical Modeling of Cardiac Fibrosis With Explicit Spatial Representation of Cellular Structure and Collagen Alignment.Journal of biomechanical engineering · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Segmentation of cardiomyocytes in microscopic 3D volumes is key to our understanding of cardiac (patho-)physiology; however, it poses substantial experimental and analytical challenges. Therefore, researchers often resort to inferring 3D information from 2D segmentations, which can lead to biased and incorrect conclusions. Deep learning-based methods are showing promise with respect to robustly segmenting objects in volumes acquired using various imaging modalities; yet, they have not been applied to high-resolution 3D cardiomyocyte segmentations, and suitable open-source tools and datasets are lacking. Here, we present a deep learning-enabled toolkit for segmentation of individual cardiomyocytes in 3D confocal microscopy volumes. We include a dataset of 73 volumes with expert annotations, covering seven species, including mouse, human, and elephant, and containing samples generated under different experimental conditions, such as post-myocardial infarction and ex vivo slice cultures. The toolkit additionally contains an image restoration workflow to address imaging-related artefacts, such as spatially varying blur. Our automatic cardiomyocyte segmentation workflow achieved an adapted Rand error of 0.063 ± 0.034 (∼94% voxel-pair agreement) on the test set. Our semi-automatic workflow reached a throughput of 3 cells min
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.