Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41031902›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of physiology2026

A deep learning-enabled toolkit for the 3D segmentation of ventricular cardiomyocytes.

Joachim Greiner, Fabio Frangiamore, Frédéric Sonak, Josef Madl, Thomas Seidel, Peter Kohl, Eva A Rog-Zielinska

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Joachim GreinerInstitute for Experimental Cardiovascular Medicine, University Heart Center Freiburg · Bad Krozingen, and Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5454-2962
Fabio FrangiamoreOrobix Srl, Bergamo, Italy.
Frédéric SonakInstitute for Experimental Cardiovascular Medicine, University Heart Center Freiburg · Bad Krozingen, and Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-0241-0894
Josef MadlInstitute for Experimental Cardiovascular Medicine, University Heart Center Freiburg · Bad Krozingen, and Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3637-2546
Thomas SeidelInstitute of Cellular and Molecular Physiology, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3127-1693
Peter KohlInstitute for Experimental Cardiovascular Medicine, University Heart Center Freiburg · Bad Krozingen, and Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0416-6270
Eva A Rog-ZielinskaInstitute for Experimental Cardiovascular Medicine, University Heart Center Freiburg · Bad Krozingen, and Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3295-4728

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) 390939984Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) 396913060Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) 404198760Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) 422681845Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) 505991664
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Segmentation of cardiomyocytes in microscopic 3D volumes is key to our understanding of cardiac (patho-)physiology; however, it poses substantial experimental and analytical challenges. Therefore, researchers often resort to inferring 3D information from 2D segmentations, which can lead to biased and incorrect conclusions. Deep learning-based methods are showing promise with respect to robustly segmenting objects in volumes acquired using various imaging modalities; yet, they have not been applied to high-resolution 3D cardiomyocyte segmentations, and suitable open-source tools and datasets are lacking. Here, we present a deep learning-enabled toolkit for segmentation of individual cardiomyocytes in 3D confocal microscopy volumes. We include a dataset of 73 volumes with expert annotations, covering seven species, including mouse, human, and elephant, and containing samples generated under different experimental conditions, such as post-myocardial infarction and ex vivo slice cultures. The toolkit additionally contains an image restoration workflow to address imaging-related artefacts, such as spatially varying blur. Our automatic cardiomyocyte segmentation workflow achieved an adapted Rand error of 0.063 ± 0.034 (∼94% voxel-pair agreement) on the test set. Our semi-automatic workflow reached a throughput of 3 cells min

Indexed as

Heart VentriclesMyocardial InfarctionMyocytes, CardiacAnimalsDatasets as TopicElephantsHorsesHumansIn Vitro TechniquesMiceMicroscopy, ConfocalRabbitsRatsSwine3D reconstructioncardiac tissue microstructurecardiomyocytesegmentationwheat germ agglutinin

Identifiers

PMID41031902
PMCPMC13327770

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.