ArticleSports medicine - open2025
The Effect of Midsole Thickness on Running Economy, Spatiotemporal Values and Perceptions of Comfort and Exertion in Well-trained Runners: A Randomized, Cross-over Trial.
Article in Sports medicine - open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of Advanced Footwear Technology on Running Economy at Slower Running Speeds: A Randomised, Cross-Over Investigation.Sports medicine - open · 2026Article
- Mechanisms, Economy, and Performance of Advanced Footwear Technology in Endurance Running-A Review.Muscles (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDistance running has been revolutionised by the introduction of modern running shoes, named advanced footwear technology (AFT). AFT shoes commonly implement carbon fibre plates to increase longitudinal bending stiffness as well as highly responsive midsole foams, which increase energy return. In 2022, World Athletics stipulated that midsoles in competition road running shoes cannot exceed 40 mm in thickness, but this limit seems arbitrary. Therefore, this study aimed to understand the effect of midsole thicknesses in AFT shoes at (40 mm) and above (50 mm) the current regulation on running economy (RE), perceived comfort and exertion, and spatiotemporal variables during treadmill and overground (400-m track) running, while comparing values to those of an entry level running shoe (EL).
resultsOn the treadmill, RE with the 40 mm shoes improved by 2.4 ± 1.1% compared with the EL shoes (56.0 ± 4.3 ml・kg− 1・min− 1 vs. 57.4 ± 4.2 ml・kg− 1・min− 1, P < 0.001) and improved further with the 50 mm shoes (55.7 ± 4.3 ml・kg− 1・min− 1, P = 0.042, -0.6 ± 1.2% vs. 40 mm). A similar pattern was seen during overground running, but no correlation was detected between the magnitude of differences for each pair of running shoes and running surface (P > 0.36). Both AFT models showed lower perceived exertion compared with the EL shoes, but no differences were detected between the AFT models. The 40 mm shoes were seen as more comfortable than both the 50 mm- and EL shoes on the treadmill as well as on the track. No differences were detected between any of the shoes with respect to ground contact time, step frequency, or step length.
conclusionIncreasing midsole thickness beyond current regulations can further improve RE, although it remains to be seen whether such differences would translate into performance. The 40-mm limit for midsole thickness imposed by World Athletics for road running shoes does not represent an upper limit beyond which no further gains can be obtained and therefore could be limiting the role of footwear in performance breakthroughs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.