ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2025
A standards-based approach to digital health research: implementing the people heart study.
Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Approaches to Collect Comprehensive Electronic Patient Data Across Multiple Providers and Payers for Research: Landscape Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo assess whether HL7 Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR) can underpin a fully standards-based, end-to-end digital research architecture, demonstrate it in a live study, and quantify its benefits for interoperability and development efficiency. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe designed a generalizable standards-based architecture to accelerate digital health research relying on FHIR as the sole transactional model throughout a participant research lifecycle starting from API-based study discovery to results. It was instantiated for People Heart Study, a real-world digital health cardiovascular-risk assessment study with its protocol transformed into FHIR resources (eligibility, consent, tasks, and results). Evaluation examined workflow coverage, validator conformance across independent servers, and points requiring custom extensions or app logic.
resultsThe architecture was implemented using cloud managed FHIR stores including an illustrative public research discovery API for first-/third-party apps. A participant-facing iOS app was published on the App Store. Our evaluation reveals that 6 of 10 research app workflows could be executed entirely from FHIR artifacts; 2 were partially standards-driven and 2 remained limited requiring custom development. All FHIR resources passed structural, semantic validation with minimal custom extension usage and terminology integrity issues. DISCUSSION: Our approach addresses persistent challenges in digital health research by enhancing data interoperability, minimizing redundant development, and supporting the full research lifecycle. The architecture aligns with national priorities and complements healthcare standardization efforts.
conclusionBy leveraging FHIR, our architecture enables generalizability, interoperability, and reuse across diverse digital health research contexts, transforming study design into data modeling rather than software development, and fostering a more inclusive and agile digital health ecosystem.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.