Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41032439›Full record

ReviewRevista de la Facultad de Ciencias Medicas (Cordoba, Argentina)2025

[Free online software tools for precision dosing of vancomycin, and other drugs]

Marianela Isabel Quereilhac, Guillermo Federico Taboada, Paulo Caceres Guido

Abstract readReviewEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Review in Revista de la Facultad de Ciencias Medicas (Cordoba, Argentina), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Marianela Isabel QuereilhacGarrahan Hospital.
Guillermo Federico TaboadaGarrahan Hospital.
Paulo Caceres GuidoGarrahan Hospital.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Software tools that assist in the pharmacotherapeutic optimization of narrow therapeutic range drugs are widely available. However, empirical (“trial and error”) methods are still common. The aim of this work was to evaluate the characteristics and performance of free-online software that assist in precision dosing of vancomycin. Materials and method: An exhaustive search was performed in Google, Google Scholar, and Pubmed/Medline, with no time limits. General descriptive and pharmacokinetic characteristics related to vancomycin and, occasionally, to other drugs were evaluated. Different scores were assigned for each attribute of each program, comparing, when appropriate, with reference programs: BestDose, PrecisePK and DoseMeRx. Results: 8 free online software were found: Clincalc, Globalrph, IDS-ODS, NextDose, TDMx, Vancocalc, VancoPK and Vancovanco. Although all of them are suitable for use, TDMx, NextDose, and IDS-ODS provided the best performance. Some are especially useful for academic settings, while others are suitable for the clinical setting. Each one must be evaluated by the users to decide its applicability. These software can be a valid option for those who are beginning to learn about pharmacotherapeutic optimization processes and for those who do not yet justify an economic investment. However, the performance of commercial programs is usually much more advantageous. Conclusions: The free online software for precision dosing of vancomycin (especially TDMx, NextDose, and IDS-ODS) can be used, with the limitations of each case, as starting assistant tools, both in the clinical and in the teaching-academic field.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsDrug Dosage CalculationsDrug Therapy, Computer-AssistedSoftwareVancomycinHumansInternetAnti-Bacterial AgentsVancomycindrug monitoringpharmacokineticsprecision medicinesoftwarevancomycin

Identifiers

PMID41032439
PMCPMC12699783

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.