ArticleBMC biology2025
Conservation genomics of two endangered buntings reveal genetic diversity before and after severe population declines.
Article in BMC biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMuseomics utilizes historical genetic data from museum specimens to inform threatened species conservation. The Yellow-breasted Bunting (Emberiza aureola) and the Jankowski's Bunting (E. jankowskii), categorized as Critically Endangered or Endangered, respectively, have experienced population declines since the 1970s-1980s. Comparing genetic diversity changes before and after declines is crucial for refining conservation strategies.
resultsWe de novo assembled genomes for both species and resequenced 29 E. aureola (16 historical pre-decline specimens from the 1930s to the 1950s) and 18 E. jankowskii (4 historical pre-decline specimens from the 1950s to the 1960s), with 45 individuals from six least-concern Emberiza species for comparison. Genetic diversity remained stable in both endangered species from the pre-decline to post-decline periods, with their overall genetic diversity levels being comparable to those of their least-concern congeners. While historically, both had large effective population sizes, E. jankowskii showed a gradual decline over 1000 generations, whereas E. aureola remained stable. Both modern populations of E. aureola and E. jankowskii exhibited a higher proportion of long runs of homozygosity (ROH) compared to their historical counterparts, indicating an increased impact of inbreeding following population declines.
conclusionsDespite severe population declines, both species retained high genetic diversity but experienced increased inbreeding. E. jankowskii faces ongoing effective population size decline. These insights guide targeted conservation strategies, highlighting the value of museomics in understanding demographic and genetic histories.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.