Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41034999›Full record

SynthesisEuropean journal of medical research2025

Advances in diagnostic techniques for eosinophilic esophagitis: a systematic review of emerging noninvasive methods.

Abdulrhman Khaled Al Abdulqader

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European journal of medical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Abdulrhman Khaled Al AbdulqaderDepartment of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, King Faisal University, 31982, Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia. alabdulqader@kfu.edu.sa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic immune-mediated disease characterized by esophageal dysfunction and eosinophilic inflammation. Traditional diagnostic methods rely on endoscopy with biopsy, which is invasive and resource-intensive. The recent advancements have focused on developing noninvasive and minimally invasive diagnostic tools to improve patient experience and facilitate disease monitoring.

objectiveThis systematic review aims to evaluate emerging noninvasive diagnostic techniques for EoE, including biomarkers, esophageal string tests (EST), and advanced imaging modalities, and their potential to complement or replace conventional diagnostic methods.

methodsA systematic search was conducted in major databases, including PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library, to identify studies investigating noninvasive diagnostic approaches for EoE. Inclusion criteria focused on original research and clinical trials evaluating diagnostic accuracy, patient acceptability, and clinical utility. Data on diagnostic methods, outcomes, and limitations were extracted and analyzed.

resultsEmerging diagnostic methods, such as blood and urine biomarkers (e.g., EDN, ECP, eotaxin-3), EST, and advanced imaging (e.g., optical coherence tomography, EndoFLIP), demonstrated comparable sensitivity and specificity to endoscopic biopsy in detecting EoE. These tools offer advantages in reducing procedural burden, enabling dynamic disease monitoring, and enhancing patient adherence. However, challenges include variability in diagnostic thresholds and limited large-scale validation.

conclusionNoninvasive diagnostic tools for EoE hold promise in transforming clinical practice by reducing reliance on invasive endoscopy. Further research is needed to standardize protocols and validate these methods for routine use.

Indexed as

Eosinophilic EsophagitisBiomarkersHumansBiomarkersAdvanced imagingBiomarkersDisease monitoringEosinophilic esophagitisEsophageal string testNoninvasive diagnostics

Identifiers

PMID41034999
PMCPMC12487343

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.