Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41035563›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in digital health2025

Development of a novel artificial intelligence algorithm for interpreting fetal heart rate and uterine activity data in cardiotocography.

Rohit Pardasani, Renee Vitullo, Sara Harris, Halit O Yapici, John Beard

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in digital health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Rohit PardasaniGE HealthCare, Chicago, IL, United States.
Renee VitulloGE HealthCare, Chicago, IL, United States.
Sara HarrisGE HealthCare, Chicago, IL, United States.
Halit O YapiciBoston Strategic Partners, Inc., Boston, MA, United States.
John BeardGE HealthCare, Chicago, IL, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Cardiotocography (CTG) assesses fetal well-being through measurements of fetal heart rate (FHR) and uterine activity (UA). Manual visual assessment of fetal tracings is variable due to the subjective nature of their interpretation. Artificial intelligence (AI) using automatic signal processing may be leveraged to support consistent, comprehensive interpretations. This study demonstrated the development and training of a novel AI algorithm that analyzes and interprets certain clinical events and parameters calculated during labor to assist with clinical decisions. Methods: Fetal tracings sourced from 19 birthing centers through a US-based healthcare delivery organization were clinically interpreted, labeled, quality checked, and ratified by clinicians to be included in the study. The algorithm using deep learning and rule-based techniques was developed to identify segments of interest (accelerations, decelerations, and contractions). A three parallel one-dimensional Unet design with two inputs (FHR and UA) and one channel output each (for accelerations, decelerations, and contractions) was selected as the final architecture. Algorithm performance was evaluated through recall (sensitivity), precision, Results: A total of 133,696 patient files were used to create fetal tracings. After the exclusion, labeling, and ratification processes, the final datasets included 1,600 tracings for training, 421 for validation, and 591 for testing. The model provided promising performance and achieved Conclusion: This study demonstrates the successful development of a novel AI algorithm utilizing FHR and UA data to analyze and interpret fetal tracing events and parameters. The algorithm may have potential to enhance patient care by supporting bedside clinician CTG interpretation.

Indexed as

cardiotocographycomputer assisted decision makingdeep learningfetal monitoringuterine activity

Identifiers

PMID41035563
PMCPMC12479546

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.