ArticleOpen veterinary journal2025
Microscopic vision of mouse kidney experimentally infected with
Article in Open veterinary journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Enterohemorrhagic Aim: This study aimed to understand the pathophysiology of Methods: Identification of the bacteria being studied and their classification is verified by isolating the bacteria using culture media and biochemical diagnosis using the Vitek device. An antibiotic sensitivity test was carried out for 10 antibiotics, calculation and determination of the bacterial count infectious dose, and the half-lethal dose (LD-50) were carried out by using the Reed-Muench method. Glass slides of kidney tissue were prepared using the sectioning method. Results: Bacteria were sensitive to most antibiotics used except Amoxicillin/clavulanic acid and ampicillin, to which they showed resistance. Ciprofloxacin exhibited the highest level of sensitivity among the antibiotics tested, with Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole placed second. Animals that have been intentionally infected with these bacteria exhibit various levels of clinical symptoms, while histological examination revealed acute atrophy in several renal glomeruli, fragmentation in others, and dilatation of the capsular or urinary space, narrowing in some urinary tubules cavities, disintegration of the epithelium, inflammatory cellular infiltration, congestion, and hemorrhage in comparison to the other groups. Conclusion: Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole and Ciprofloxacin were active in stopping diarrhea, and, regaining some activity in the mice, but tissue lesions were still evident in the mice group treated with Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole and the other group treated with the antibiotic Ciprofloxacin. The LD-50 dose group exhibited more severe levels of these symptoms. Regarding the groups that received the two antibiotics, their ability to stop diarrhea was observed, although the mice still experienced various types of tissue damage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.