SynthesisObesity facts2026
Multidimensional Characterisation of Eating Behaviour in Genetic Obesity: A Systematic Review.
Synthesis in Obesity facts, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionGenetic forms of obesity, including monogenic (MO) and syndromic (SO) obesity, are characterised by severe, early-onset weight gain due to disrupted central regulation of body weight, typically involving key pathways such as the leptin-melanocortin axis. These alterations result in marked hyperphagia and complex eating behaviours, yet clinical characterisation remains limited. This review aimed to describe the multidimensional eating behaviour profiles across genetically confirmed obesity, explore their variability, and evaluate existing assessment tools to support early diagnosis, personalised care, and therapeutic monitoring.
methodsWe conducted a systematic review following PRISMA guidelines including publications up to 4 September 2025. A total of 162 studies involving individuals with genetically confirmed SO or MO were analysed. Eating behaviours were categorised into nine dimensions: food-centred thinking, food-seeking/stealing, hunger/satiety, ingestive/oral behaviours, nutritional quality, food preferences, food acceptability, loss of control eating, and eating restraint. Assessment tools and methodologies were systematically reviewed.
resultsHyperphagia was consistently reported across genetic aetiologies, though definitions and measures remain heterogeneous. Prader-Willi syndrome (PWS), the most studied condition, was associated with early-onset hyperphagia, increased hunger, pronounced food preoccupation, compulsive food-seeking/stealing and strong preferences for carbohydrate-rich, large quantities and unusual food items. Similar behavioural traits were found in other SO and MO, including Bardet-Biedl syndrome, Alström syndrome, Fragile X syndrome, WAGR syndrome, pseudohypoparathyroidism Ia, 16p11.2 deletion and LEPR, POMC, and MC4R deficiencies. Behavioural traits appeared relatively consistent across sex, age, and genotypes within syndromes. Most studies relied on caregiver reports; existing tools such as the Hyperphagia Questionnaire (HQ) and Food-Related Problem Questionnaire (FRPQ), developed primarily for PWS, did not fully capture the behavioural spectrum or suit all cognitive profiles. Tools applicable to individuals without intellectual developmental disorders, particularly adults living independently, remain scarce.
conclusionThis is the first systematic review to comprehensively map eating behaviours across rare genetic obesity using a multidimensional approach. It highlights the shared feature of disrupted appetite regulation and emphasises the need for standardised, multidimensional tools suitable for both clinical and research contexts. Better behavioural characterisation will support targeted therapies and improve outcome monitoring in these high-need populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.