ArticleScandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine2025
The effects of norepinephrine in shockable cardiac arrest, a scoping review.
Article in Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pharmacologic Strategies for Intraoperative Hypotension When Ephedrine Is Unavailable: An Evidence-Based Review.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Review
- Reply to: comments on "The effects of norepinephrine in shockable cardiac arrest, a scoping review".Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2026Article
- Comments on "The effects of norepinephrine in shockable cardiac arrest, a scoping review".Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOut-of-hospital cardiac arrest is considered a major public health issue with an incidence of 67-170 per 100.000 inhabitants in Europe. Sufficient coronary perfusion pressure is a requisite for successful defibrillation and return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). Although epinephrine (E) was found to increase ROSC and hospital survival when compared to placebo, its role in shockable arrest is under debate due to the absence of favorable neurological outcome.
objectiveNorepinephrine (NE) increases coronary perfusion pressure and may be an alternative for epinephrine because of differences in affinity in alpha- and beta- adrenergic receptors.
methodsAn extensive literature search was conducted in PreMedline, Medline, Embase and Cochrane electronic databases. All original studies (randomized controlled trials, experimental and observational studies, including case-reports) were included; guidelines, (editorial) reviews and commentaries were excluded, no date constraints were applied. Articles were included in the literature review if they described intra-arrest administration of norepinephrine and contained at least an abstract in English, French, or German.
resultsA total of 3308 articles were screened after deduplication. Following initial title/ abstract screening, full-texts analysis was performed in n = 46 studies. A total of 18 articles were included, consisting of 5 human and 13 animal studies. Norepinephrine appears to optimize macrocirculatory-and myocardial hemodynamics, increased regional cerebral blood flow and might improve survival.
conclusionNorepinephrine has shown several beneficial effects when administered during shockable cardiac arrest in animal studies, with similar signals suggested in human studies. Despite the limited evidence, norepinephrine appears to offer potential advantages over epinephrine in terms of multiple haemodynamic parameters and possible survival.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.