Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41039564›Full record

ArticleScandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine2025

The effects of norepinephrine in shockable cardiac arrest, a scoping review.

S J M Bouman, E Baldussu, G H L M Franssen, G J van Geffen, J Bruhn, C Slagt, L P W Mommers

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Reply to: comments on "The effects of norepinephrine in shockable cardiac arrest, a scoping review".Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2026
    Article
  3. Comments on "The effects of norepinephrine in shockable cardiac arrest, a scoping review".Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

S J M BoumanDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands. stef.bouman@mumc.nl.
E BaldussuDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
G H L M FranssenInformation Specialist Department of Education, Content and Support, University Library, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.
G J van GeffenHelicopter Emergency Medical Service Lifeliner 3, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
J BruhnDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Pain and Palliative Medicine, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
C SlagtHelicopter Emergency Medical Service Lifeliner 3, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
L P W MommersDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOut-of-hospital cardiac arrest is considered a major public health issue with an incidence of 67-170 per 100.000 inhabitants in Europe. Sufficient coronary perfusion pressure is a requisite for successful defibrillation and return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). Although epinephrine (E) was found to increase ROSC and hospital survival when compared to placebo, its role in shockable arrest is under debate due to the absence of favorable neurological outcome.

objectiveNorepinephrine (NE) increases coronary perfusion pressure and may be an alternative for epinephrine because of differences in affinity in alpha- and beta- adrenergic receptors.

methodsAn extensive literature search was conducted in PreMedline, Medline, Embase and Cochrane electronic databases. All original studies (randomized controlled trials, experimental and observational studies, including case-reports) were included; guidelines, (editorial) reviews and commentaries were excluded, no date constraints were applied. Articles were included in the literature review if they described intra-arrest administration of norepinephrine and contained at least an abstract in English, French, or German.

resultsA total of 3308 articles were screened after deduplication. Following initial title/ abstract screening, full-texts analysis was performed in n = 46 studies. A total of 18 articles were included, consisting of 5 human and 13 animal studies. Norepinephrine appears to optimize macrocirculatory-and myocardial hemodynamics, increased regional cerebral blood flow and might improve survival.

conclusionNorepinephrine has shown several beneficial effects when administered during shockable cardiac arrest in animal studies, with similar signals suggested in human studies. Despite the limited evidence, norepinephrine appears to offer potential advantages over epinephrine in terms of multiple haemodynamic parameters and possible survival.

Indexed as

Cardiopulmonary ResuscitationElectric CountershockNorepinephrineOut-of-Hospital Cardiac ArrestVasoconstrictor AgentsHumansNorepinephrineVasoconstrictor AgentsCardiopulmonary resuscitationNorepinephrineScoping reviewShockable cardiac arrest

Identifiers

PMID41039564
PMCPMC12492856

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.