ArticleInternational journal of retina and vitreous2025
Quantification of intermittent retinal capillary perfusion in retinal vein occlusion and proliferative diabetic retinopathy.
Article in International journal of retina and vitreous, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo detect and quantify intermittent capillary perfusion using optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) in patients with branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO), central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO), proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR), and healthy control eyes.
methodsOCTA images were acquired from patients with BRVO(n = 9), CRVO(n = 8), PDR(n = 8) and healthy controls(n = 10). Five 6 × 6 mm scans were registered and averaged at baseline (T0) and thirty minutes after (T30) into single en-face images of the superficial and deep vascular complexes (SVC and DVC). Pixels were labeled as vessel or non-vessel using a previously published machine learning model. Loss of Perfusion (LoP) was defined as the percentage of vessel pixels present in T0 image that disappeared at T30, and Gain of Perfusion (GoP) was defined as the percentage of vessel pixels that appeared in T30 image. The amount of intermittent capillary perfusion was the sum of GoPLoP.
resultsPatients with PDR, CRVO and BRVO showed significantly higher GoPLoP values than controls in both the macular and temporal regions. The temporal region generally exhibited significantly greater GoPLoP values than the macular region. Layer analysis indicated a significantly higher GoPLoP within the DVC compared to the SVC. There was a significant negative correlation between perfusion density and perfusion variability.
conclusionOur results demonstrate higher GoPLoP in BRVO, CRVO, and PDR patients compared to controls. This measure may be utilized as a novel biomarker of tissue hypoxia. Further studies are necessary to better elucidate the role of GoPLoP in monitoring disease progression and treatment efficacy of retinal vascular diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.