ArticleAddiction (Abingdon, England)2026
OK Boomer: A longitudinal analysis unravelling generational cohort differences in alcohol consumption among Australians.
Article in Addiction (Abingdon, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Comprehensive Study of Hops (Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- OK Boomer: A longitudinal analysis unravelling generational cohort differences in alcohol consumption among Australians.Addiction (Abingdon, England) · 2026Article
- Work Hard… Drink Hard? Occupational, Sociodemographic and Health Determinants of High-Risk Alcohol Consumption Among Australian Workers.Drug and alcohol review · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimsAlcohol consumption is a key preventable cause of disease and injury worldwide. Recent evidence suggests that younger generations may be consuming less alcohol. However, it is still uncertain whether this trend is temporary or indicative of an enduring generational shift. This study sought to determine whether there are generational differences in alcohol consumption in Australia, while accounting for age and other sociodemographic factors. DESIGN AND
settingThe analysis used data from the Household Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia (HILDA) Survey.
participantsThe analysis included 23 368 participants (51.9% female) across 23 waves of data. Participants were classified into different generational cohorts according to Pew Research Centre definitions: Silent Generation (1928-1945), Baby Boomers (1946-1964), Generation X (1965-1980), Millennials (1981-1996) and Generation Z (1997-2012). MEASUREMENTS: The study included three outcome measures: 1) abstention; 2) typical alcohol consumption per drinking occasion; and 3) typical weekly alcohol consumption.
findingsAlthough the likelihood of abstaining from alcohol consumption increased with age, Generation Z [odds ratio (OR) = 17.74, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 13.22-23.80, P < 0.001], Millennials (OR = 9.67, 95% CI = 7.98-11.71, P < 0.001) and Generation X (OR = 3.29, 95% CI = 2.75-3.92, P < 0.001) exhibited increased odds of abstention when compared with Baby Boomers, while the Silent Generation demonstrated decreased odds (OR = 0.33, 95% CI = 0.27-0.41, P < 0.001). Among drinkers, the quantity of per-occasion alcohol consumption reached its peak in early adulthood. Millennials (β = 0.52, 95% CI = 0.44-0.60, P < 0.001) and Generation X (β = 0.40, 95% CI = 0.32-0.47, P < 0.001) self-reported a significantly higher quantity of per-occasion alcohol consumption compared with Baby Boomers, while Generation Z did not significantly differ (β = 0.10, 95% CI = -0.02 to 0.23, P = 0.106) and the Silent Generation consumed significantly less (β = -0.21, 95% CI = -0.30 to -0.11, P < 0.001). Weekly quantity of alcohol consumption among drinkers peaked in early adulthood and midlife, with the Silent Generation [exp(β) = 1.16, 95% CI = 1.09-1.23, P < 0.001] exhibiting the highest levels of consumption, while Generation Z [exp(β) = 0.57, 95% CI = 0.53-0.62, P < 0.001] and Millennials [exp(β) = 0.77, 95% CI = [0.73-0.81, P < 0.001] demonstrated the lowest (compared to Baby Boomers).
conclusionsIn Australia, there appear to be generational differences in alcohol consumption, including an increase in abstention and an overall reduction in alcohol consumption among Generation Z compared with previous generations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.