ArticleClinical and translational science2025
Real-World Evaluation of Outcomes and Safety of Elexacaftor/Tezacaftor/Ivacaftor in Pediatric Patients With Cystic Fibrosis: A Retrospective Study.
Article in Clinical and translational science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prevalence of Cystic Fibrosis and Pattern of Lung Function Impairment in Adults Presenting With Bronchiectasis at a Tertiary Care Hospital in Resource Poor Country Bangladesh: A Cross-Sectional Study.Health science reports · 2026Article
- Long-term impact of Elexacaftor/Tezacaftor/ivacaftor on pulmonary, nutritional and metabolic outcomes in homozygous F508del cystic fibrosis patients: A real-world cohort study.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2026Article
- Real-World Effectiveness of Elexacaftor/Tezacaftor/Ivacaftor in Cystic Fibrosis: A 24-Month Italian National Registry Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Real-World Evaluation of Outcomes and Safety of Elexacaftor/Tezacaftor/Ivacaftor in Pediatric Patients With Cystic Fibrosis: A Retrospective Study.Clinical and translational science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Elexacaftor/Tezacaftor/Ivacaftor (ETI) therapy has significantly improved clinical outcomes in people with cystic fibrosis (PwCF) carrying at least one Phe508del CFTR mutation. However, real-world evidence on the safety and effectiveness of ETI in pediatric populations remains limited, particularly in children with more severe disease phenotypes who are often excluded from clinical trials. We analyzed clinical, functional, and microbiological data from pediatric CF patients aged 6-17 years treated with ETI between October 2022 and March 2024. Lung function (ppFEV
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.