ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2025
Esketamine versus fentanyl as adjuncts to hepatic hilar nerve block for ambulatory percutaneous liver tumor ablation focusing on respiratory safety: protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Prospective Dose-Finding of Esketamine for Suppressing Cervical Dilation Response in Ambulatory Hysteroscopy Under Monitored Anesthesia Care.Drug design, development and therapy · 2025Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Opioid-induced respiratory depression (OIRD) is a critical safety concern during ambulatory percutaneous liver tumor thermal ablation. Esketamine has been shown to offer a promising opioid-sparing alternative with the potential to provide respiratory stability benefits. We hypothesize that hepatic hilar nerve block (HHNB) combined with esketamine will reduce the incidence of respiratory depression when compared to HHNB in conjunction with fentanyl in this particular context. Methods: This single-center, prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled trial (RCT) will enroll patients undergoing ambulatory ultrasound-guided percutaneous liver thermal ablation. Patients will be randomly assigned to receive either intravenous esketamine 0.37 mg kg Results and analysis: The primary outcome is the incidence of respiratory depression, defined as SpO Conclusion and discussion: This trial aims to provide Level I evidence comparing the respiratory depression risk between esketamine-based and fentanyl-based analgesia during HHNB-guided liver ablation. Should esketamine prove to be demonstrably superior in terms of respiratory safety, HHNB-esketamine has the potential to be a viable treatment option.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.