Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41042383›Full record

ArticleChild's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery2025

Utility of invasive intracranial pressure monitoring in children with craniosynostosis: relationship to clinical assessment, syndrome and surgical treatment.

Ioanna Mavrantoni, Greg James, Emer Mulholland, Claudia Craven

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ioanna MavrantoniDepartment of Internal Medicine, William Harvey Hospital, Ashford, UK. Ioanna.mavrantonis@gmail.com.ORCID 0009-0008-9612-4513
Greg JamesDepartment of Neurosurgery, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3014-7428
Emer MulhollandUniversity Hospitals Plymouth, NHS Trust, Plymouth, UK.
Claudia CravenDepartment of Paediatric Neurology, Cambridge Univeristy Hospitals, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6199-0090

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThis is a retrospective study investigating intracranial pressure monitoring (ICPM) as a tool for managing children with craniosynostosis. We report on our experience of chronic (≥24 hour) ICP measurement in patients with CS and related conditions, with the aim of statistically assessing the relationship between ICP and derived variables to clinically relevant patient characteristics, such as clinical/ophthalmological symptoms/signs, diagnosis, syndrome and surgical management.

methodsIt is a single-centre study following 32 patients who underwent ICP monitoring over 24-72 h. We collected a consecutive series of children (aged < 18 years) who underwent invasive ICPM between 1st Jan 2019 and 31st December 2021 from our institution's electronic surgical database. All patients had either craniosynostosis or foramen magnum pathology. We excluded children with non-CS diagnoses, except those with non-CS-related foramen magnum stenosis (FMS) who were used as comparative controls. Statistical analysis included the Kruskal-Wallis test to compare median ICP results between craniosynostosis and foramen magnum pathology, surgery vs non-surgical management, and differences in syndromic subgroups. A Spearman correlation was used to determine the relation of ICPM results to presentation symptoms.

resultsResults showed that patients who underwent surgery had a higher ICPM than those that did not. They also showed that patients with CS had higher ICP when compared to foramen magnum pathologies. Results also showed differences in pulse altitude (PA) in different subtypes of CS, although not statistically significant, and a mild correlation of PA with certain presenting symptoms of CS deterioration. DISCUSSION: In conclusion, our study shows that ICP and PA are safe and useful tools that can differentiate between craniosynostosis and similar pathology, as well as correlate to symptomatology. Furthermore, the data in this study can help us understand what a 'well' ICP is, in patients with various CS conditions, which differs from a "signature" raised ICP in patients close to decompensation. ICP can therefore be a valuable tool in surgical decision making, in conjunction with clinical correlation.

Indexed as

CraniosynostosesIntracranial HypertensionIntracranial PressureAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInfantMaleMonitoring, PhysiologicNeurosurgical ProceduresRetrospective StudiesSyndromeCraniosynostosisForamen magnum pathologyIntracranial pressure monitoringNeurosurgeryPaediatrics

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.