Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41042438›Full record

ArticlePain and therapy2025

Buprenorphine Substitution as a Tapering Strategy for Opioid Discontinuation in Patients with Chronic Pain: A Nonrandomized and Proof of Concept Study.

Célian Bertin, Nicolas Kerckhove, Florent Ferrer, Bruno Pereira, Christian Duale, Damien Richard, Nicolas Authier, Noémie Delage

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pain and therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03156907 (High Dosage Buprenorphine as a Drug Strategy Withdrawal Assistance of Analgesics Opioid After Failure of an Opioid Tapering-off Strategy.), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03156907 phase2unknown statusnot on this map

High Dosage Buprenorphine as a Drug Strategy Withdrawal Assistance of Analgesics Opioid After Failure of an Opioid Tapering-off Strategy.

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Hospital, Clermont-FerrandRan2017 to 2025Enrolled60ConditionsHigh Dosage BuprenorphineArmsBuprenorphine
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Célian BertinCentres Addictovigilance et Pharmacovigilance, Centre Evaluation et Traitement de la Douleur, Direction de la Recherche Clinique et de l'Innovation, Université Clermont Auvergne, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, UMR Inserm 1107-Neuro-Dol, Inserm CIC 1405, Service de Pharmacologie Médicale, 63000, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Nicolas KerckhoveCentres Addictovigilance et Pharmacovigilance, Centre Evaluation et Traitement de la Douleur, Direction de la Recherche Clinique et de l'Innovation, Université Clermont Auvergne, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, UMR Inserm 1107-Neuro-Dol, Inserm CIC 1405, Service de Pharmacologie Médicale, 63000, Clermont-Ferrand, France. nkerckhove@chu-clermontferrand.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2223-1240
Florent FerrerCentres Addictovigilance et Pharmacovigilance, Centre Evaluation et Traitement de la Douleur, Direction de la Recherche Clinique et de l'Innovation, Université Clermont Auvergne, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, UMR Inserm 1107-Neuro-Dol, Inserm CIC 1405, Service de Pharmacologie Médicale, 63000, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Bruno PereiraCentres Addictovigilance et Pharmacovigilance, Centre Evaluation et Traitement de la Douleur, Direction de la Recherche Clinique et de l'Innovation, Université Clermont Auvergne, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, UMR Inserm 1107-Neuro-Dol, Inserm CIC 1405, Service de Pharmacologie Médicale, 63000, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Christian DualeCentres Addictovigilance et Pharmacovigilance, Centre Evaluation et Traitement de la Douleur, Direction de la Recherche Clinique et de l'Innovation, Université Clermont Auvergne, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, UMR Inserm 1107-Neuro-Dol, Inserm CIC 1405, Service de Pharmacologie Médicale, 63000, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Damien RichardCentres Addictovigilance et Pharmacovigilance, Centre Evaluation et Traitement de la Douleur, Direction de la Recherche Clinique et de l'Innovation, Université Clermont Auvergne, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, UMR Inserm 1107-Neuro-Dol, Inserm CIC 1405, Service de Pharmacologie Médicale, 63000, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Nicolas AuthierCentres Addictovigilance et Pharmacovigilance, Centre Evaluation et Traitement de la Douleur, Direction de la Recherche Clinique et de l'Innovation, Université Clermont Auvergne, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, UMR Inserm 1107-Neuro-Dol, Inserm CIC 1405, Service de Pharmacologie Médicale, 63000, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Noémie DelageCentres Addictovigilance et Pharmacovigilance, Centre Evaluation et Traitement de la Douleur, Direction de la Recherche Clinique et de l'Innovation, Université Clermont Auvergne, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, UMR Inserm 1107-Neuro-Dol, Inserm CIC 1405, Service de Pharmacologie Médicale, 63000, Clermont-Ferrand, France.

Funding

APICIL 2016Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Clermont-Ferrand AOI2015
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionLong-term use (≥ 3 months) of opioids for chronic noncancer pain (CNCP) shows limited benefit and often leads to dependence, especially when tapered too quickly. Standard opioid discontinuation typically involves gradual dose reduction, yet many patients fail to complete it. Meta-analyses show buprenorphine reduces withdrawal severity, increases treatment retention and completion rates, and facilitates analgesia and smoother transitions in patients with chronic pain, with low adverse effects and high initiation success.

methodsThis single-center, prospective, nonrandomized proof-of-concept study assessed the efficacy of an outpatient buprenorphine-based discontinuation strategy in patients with CNCP and opioid dependence who had failed standard tapering. Participants first attempted gradual tapering; those unsuccessful transitioned to buprenorphine: 4-8 mg/day for 1 month, followed by tapering over up to 9 months. Success was defined as complete opioid cessation at 9 months, confirmed by urine analysis (including buprenorphine). The primary outcome was the success rate of the buprenorphine strategy, with ≥ 60% considered effective. A secondary outcome compared success rates between strategies.

resultsOf 20 patients, six (30.0%) successfully withdrew using standard tapering. Fourteen failed; 11 of them transitioned to buprenorphine. Of these, seven (63.6%) achieved full discontinuation. While not statistically significant, the buprenorphine group showed a higher success rate than standard tapering (p = 0.076; OR = 4.08 [0.90-21.23]).

conclusionsBuprenorphine substitution appears at least as effective as conventional tapering and may benefit patients unable to succeed with tapering alone. These preliminary results support further investigation in larger trials.

trial registrationClinicalTrials. gov identifier, NCT03156907.

Indexed as

BuprenorphineNon-cancer chronic painOpioid taperingOpioid use disorderPain clinicProof-of-concept

Identifiers

PMID41042438
PMCPMC12634938

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.