ArticleComputational biology and chemistry2026
EnsembleRegNet: Interpretable deep learning for transcriptional network inference from single-cell RNA-seq.
Article in Computational biology and chemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Integrating the Contrasting Perspectives Between the Constrained Disorder Principle and Deterministic Optical Nanoscopy: Enhancing Information Extraction from Imaging of Complex Systems.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Gene regulatory networks (GRNs) govern gene expression and cellular identity, but accurately inferring their structure from high-dimensional single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) data remains a major challenge. Here, we present EnsembleRegNet, a deep learning framework that infers transcription factor (TF)-target gene relationships by integrating an ensemble encoder-decoder and multilayer perceptron (MLP) architecture. EnsembleRegNet utilizes Hodges-Lehmann estimator (HLE)-based binarization, case-deletion analysis, motif enrichment using RcisTarget, and regulon activity scoring with AUCell to enhance both robustness and biological interpretability. Extensive evaluations across simulated and real scRNA-seq datasets demonstrate that EnsembleRegNet outperforms existing GRN inference methods, including SCENIC and SIGNET, in both clustering performance and regulatory accuracy. By uncovering cell-type-specific regulatory modules and enhancing interpretability, EnsembleRegNet offers a scalable and biologically grounded framework for exploring transcriptional regulation. Its demonstrated performance establishes a new benchmark for GRN inference and highlights its promise for applications in disease modeling, biomarker discovery, and cellular reprogramming.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.