ReviewBiological psychiatry2026
Task and Resting-State Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Modeling of Brain-Behavior Relationships in Developmental Cohorts.
Review in Biological psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Modeling differences in neurodevelopmental maturity of the reading network using support vector regression on functional connectivity data.Developmental cognitive neuroscience · 2026Article
- Multimodal brain imaging neurotransmitter marker study of TD: a review of TCM effect mechanisms and precise diagnosis and treatment combining traditional Chinese and western medicine.American journal of translational research · 2026Review
- Cerebellar dysconnectivity in schizophrenia spectrum: task-based functional connectivity analysis and cognitive stratification.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data are often used to inform individual differences in cognitive, behavioral, and psychiatric phenotypes. These so-called brain-behavior association studies come in many flavors and are increasingly the focus of investigations utilizing large population neuroscience datasets. However, many questions remain surrounding the utility of task and resting-state fMRI (rs-fMRI) for modeling brain-behavior relationships, including the feasibility of conducting these investigations in developmental cohorts. With the growing availability of large neurodevelopmental datasets such as that provided by the ABCD (Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development) Study, we are now able to conduct well-powered analyses using large samples of longitudinal neuroimaging data collected from diverse populations of youth. Here we provide a high-level review of current controversies and challenges in this growing subfield of neuroscience, highlighting examples where task fMRI data and rs-fMRI data-either in isolation or combined-have yielded significant insights into brain-behavior associations. Challenges include issues related to measurement noise, appropriate estimation of effect sizes, and limits to generalizability due to insufficient diversity of samples. Innovative solutions involving advanced MRI data acquisition protocols, application of multivariate analysis methods, and more robust consideration of phenotypic complexity are reviewed. We propose that additional future directions for developmental cognitive neuroscience should include more reliable behavioral measures, multimodal neuroimaging brain-behavior studies, and greater consideration of environmental and other contextual influences on brain-behavior associations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.