ArticleJACC. Advances2025
Association Between Pressure-Adjusted Heart Rate and In-Hospital Mortality in Cardiogenic Shock.
Article in JACC. Advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pressure-Adjusted Heart Rate Predicts Mortality and Resource Utilization in Cardiogenic Shock: An Analysis of the MIMIC-IV Database.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2026Article
- Pressure-Adjusted Heart Rate by Echocardiography and Mortality in the Cardiac Intensive Care Unit.JACC. Advances · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAmong patients with cardiogenic shock (CS), higher right atrial pressure (RAP) and lower mean arterial pressure (MAP) are associated with higher in-hospital mortality. Pressure-adjusted heart rate (PAHR), defined as heart rate × RAP/MAP, integrates these parameters. The prognostic significance of PAHR has not been assessed in patients with CS.
objectivesThe authors aimed to assess if PAHR values are associated with risk of in-hospital mortality in patients with CS.
methodsCCCTN (Critical Care Cardiology Trials Network) is a multinational registry of cardiac intensive care units coordinated by the TIMI Study Group. Among CS admissions (2018-2023) undergoing invasive hemodynamic assessment within 24 hours of cardiac intensive care unit admission, we assessed the relationship of PAHR with in-hospital mortality. Patients with concurrent mechanical circulatory support were excluded in the primary analysis. ORs were adjusted for age, sex, vasoactive-inotropic score, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (SCAI) stage, and preceding cardiac arrest.
resultsAmong the 1411 CS admissions in the analysis (18% with acute myocardial infarction), 75% were receiving vasoactive support at the time of assessment. Median heart rate was 92 beats/min, RAP 15 mm Hg, MAP 75 mm Hg, and PAHR 17. There was a stepwise gradient of higher in-hospital mortality with higher presenting PAHR values. In adjusted models, a higher PAHR was incrementally associated with higher in-hospital mortality (adjusted OR per 10 units: 1.35 [95% CI: 1.15-1.58]), and PAHR had stronger prognostic associations with mortality than its individual hemodynamic components.
conclusionsPAHR, a simple hemodynamic index calculated from vital signs and central venous pressure, is strongly associated with in-hospital mortality in CS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.