ArticleNature communications2025
Stage-dependent cerebrocerebellar communication during sensorimotor processing.
Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cerebellar rhythms: mechanisms, functions and translational opportunities.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2026Review
- EEG-ECeG Coherence Mapping of Human Cerebro-cerebellar Projections: An Exploratory Study.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2026Article
- Cerebellar perturbation impairs human working memory and degrades spatial tuning throughout cortex.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Topographical Relationship in the Mesodiencephalic Projection to the Inferior Olive Linked With Cerebellar Hemispheric Lobules in Mice.The Journal of comparative neurology · 2026Article
- The cerebellum engages multiple pre-motor pathways through a divergent-convergent architecture to shape whisker dynamics.Frontiers in neural circuits · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cerebral cortex and cerebellum are essential for sensorimotor control, but the dynamics of their interactions remain unclear. Here, we investigated which pathways prevail during preparation and execution of spontaneous whisker movements in mice. During preparation, neuronal activity of primary motor (M1) and somatosensory (S1) cortex precede that of cerebellar crus regions, with a lead that is consistent with relaying a copy of motor commands. After movement onset, the phase of the signal inverts, indicating a dominant vector signaling from cerebellum to cerebrum. At this stage, Purkinje cell activity correlates more with S1 than M1, generating a prediction of sensory consequences during motor actions. A computational cerebello-cortical model could replicate the changes in dynamics and directionality. Optogenetic manipulations of pons and thalamus confirm the modeled predictions on stage-dependent dynamics. Together our data point towards a swap in direction of information flow between cerebrum and cerebellum when motor preparation switches to execution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.