Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41044134›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Evaluation of esophageal tubing and buccal swabbing versus rumen cannula to characterize ruminal microbiota in cows fed contrasting diets.

Lysiane Dunière, Philippe Ruiz, Frédérique Chaucheyras-Durand, Mathieu Silberberg, Anne Boudon, Pierre Nozière, Evelyne Forano

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Lysiane DunièreLallemand SAS, Blagnac, 31702, France.
Philippe RuizINRAE, Université Clermont Auvergne, UMR454 MEDIS, Saint-Genès Champanelle, 63122, France.
Frédérique Chaucheyras-DurandLallemand SAS, Blagnac, 31702, France.
Mathieu SilberbergINRAE, Université Clermont Auvergne, VetAgro Sup, UMR1213 Herbivores, Saint-Genès Champanelle, 63122, France.
Anne BoudonINRAE, Institut Agro, UMR1348 PEGASE, Saint-Gilles, 35590, France.
Pierre NozièreINRAE, Université Clermont Auvergne, VetAgro Sup, UMR1213 Herbivores, Saint-Genès Champanelle, 63122, France.
Evelyne ForanoINRAE, Université Clermont Auvergne, UMR454 MEDIS, Saint-Genès Champanelle, 63122, France. evelyne.forano@inrae.fr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rumen microorganisms are primarily essential for feed decomposition and nutrition of the host animal, playing a key role in the health and well-being of cattle as well as the efficiency of milk or meat production. However, they also generate pollutant emissions such as methane. Analysing this microbiota under different farming conditions is therefore essential for optimizing production while minimizing its environmental impact. In this study, with metataxonomic sequencing and qPCR, we analysed the composition of the cow rumen microbiota sampled through the cannula and via esophageal tubing before morning feeding under two contrasting diets, low- and high-starch contents. Buccal swabs were also collected at the same sampling times to assess their potential as a proxy for the rumen microbiota. The two rumen sampling methods resulted in similar taxonomic compositions of bacteria, Archaea, fungi and protozoa and showed similar changes after the diet shift, indicating that the use of esophageal tubing is a reliable method for capturing the microbiota structure and its potential shifts following dietary changes. In contrast, the buccal swabs did not accurately reflect the rumen microbiota under the low- and high-starch diets, even after specific stringent filtering of the buccal sequences. Furthermore, we identified microbial markers of acidogenic challenge, with Dialister spp. also detected in buccal swab samples as potential indicators.

Indexed as

Animal FeedCannulaDietGastrointestinal MicrobiomeMicrobiotaRumenAnimalsArchaeaBacteriaCattleEsophagusFemaleFungiBuccal swabsCannulaEsophageal tubingHigh-starch dietRumen microbiotaSampling methods

Identifiers

PMID41044134
PMCPMC12494722

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.