ArticleScientific reports2025
Graph-like organization of non-spatial knowledge about social closeness in movie narratives.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Research in cognitive science has progressively highlighted the notion of geometric representations (map and graph-like structures) for storing and organizing knowledge in both spatial and non-spatial domains. It's unclear, however, whether these representations aid in organizing knowledge from unconstrained and naturalistic episodic encoding and whether it is possible to identify objective episodic parameters that support the implicit construction of structural-semantic knowledge. Here, we investigated how statistical regularities in a movie narrative contribute to the generalization process underlying social knowledge's gradual construction and organization. Using the narrative of a TV series, participants watched five episodes and then performed a retrieval task in which they rated the strength of social relationships between characters (i.e., social closeness). An objective graph of social closeness, based on parameters extracted from the teleplay, was compared to subjective social graphs derived from participants' judgments. The results revealed a strong correlation between the two graphs and highlighted the importance of physical co-occurrence in shaping social representations. The generalization process was independent of awareness of task demands, suggesting an implicit mechanism. Additionally, increased episodic exposure improved both the inter-subject stability and the coherence of the social graphs, supporting the notion that repeated episodic experiences enhance semantic representations. These findings emphasize the role of episodic statistical regularities as building blocks for the organization of non-spatial, conceptual knowledge in graph-like structures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.