ArticleNaunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology2026
Real-world safety profile of bisoprolol: signal detection and demographic stratification using the FAERS database.
Article in Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Assessing the risk of adverse drug events from combining aromatase inhibitors with CDK4/6 inhibitors using the FAERS and JADER databases.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bisoprolol, a selective β₁-blocker, is widely prescribed for cardiovascular disease. Real-world pharmacovigilance can clarify adverse drug reactions (ADRs) across demographic strata and identify signals not fully characterized in trials. We analyzed bisoprolol-associated reports in the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System. Disproportionality was assessed using complementary algorithms-reporting odds ratio (ROR), proportional reporting ratio (PRR), information component (IC with IC025), and empirical Bayes geometric mean (EBGM with EBGM05). To stabilize sparse strata, we required a ≥ 3 and multi-algorithm concordance (EBGM05 > 2, IC025 > 0, lower95_ROR > 1). Multiple testing was controlled using Benjamini-Hochberg FDR and Bonferroni adjustments. Signals were summarized overall and stratified by sex and age (< 40, 40-80, ≥ 80 years). Class-expected cardiovascular ADRs showed robust signals, including bradycardia, sinus bradycardia, bradyarrhythmia, atrioventricular block, hypotension, syncope/presyncope (all meeting stability and multiplicity criteria). Several hypothesis-generating signals with strong effect sizes were detected: cardiospasm (ROR≈285; EBGM05≈178), palmoplantar keratoderma (ROR≈217; EBGM05≈137), and hyperkalemia (ROR≈16.7; EBGM05≈13). Sex- and age-stratified analyses revealed clinically relevant patterns: in younger patients (< 40), bradyarrhythmia-type signals were most pronounced; in middle-aged adults (40-80), cardiospasm and palmoplantar keratoderma ranked among the top signals; in older adults (≥ 80), conduction-slowing events remained prominent. Overall reporting skewed female (≈55%) and older age. A qualitative EudraVigilance cross-check identified parallel case clusters for cardiospasm and palmoplantar keratoderma, corroborating cross-jurisdictional presence. FAERS data reaffirm bisoprolol's known bradycardic and hypotensive risks and highlight novel, biologically plausible signals-particularly cardiospasm and palmoplantar keratoderma-that vary by demographic subgroup. These findings support targeted clinical vigilance (heart-rate/conduction, electrolytes, dysphagia/chest pain, palmoplantar skin changes) and motivate confirmatory studies (prospective cohorts, nested case-controls). While robust to multiplicity control, signals remain hypothesis-generating given spontaneous-reporting biases; cautious interpretation and validation are warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41044440What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.