ArticlePlant methods2025
Accurate detections of the heterozygous SNPs with rice genomic data and prediction of de novo spontaneous mutation rate.
Article in Plant methods, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe use of Illumina sequencing technologies has enabled the identification and removal of mutations in various plant species. However, the Illumina sequencing method requires a considerable amount of data to ensure its integrity and quality due to the enormous number of false positives. This study aimed to explore an effective genomic data analysis for the detection of heterozygous variant (HV) in rice varieties.
resultsWe compared the accuracy of four combinations of mapping tools and variant calling pipelines and selected BWA-MEM2 with GATK4.3 HaplotypeCaller. To detect heterozygous de novo polymorphisms such as HVs in the three different rice varieties (Nipponbare, Kitaake, and Hinohikari), we adopted the following cost-saving procedures; secondary references were created in Nipponbare and Kitaake, and generation-based comparison was performed in Hinohikari. The similar HVs were estimated by the three varieties to range from 2.55814 × 10
conclusionsWe have developed a methodology for the detection of true positive HVs within Illumina sequencing techniques. This system removed false positive HVs, allowing for the estimation of true positive HVs and, consequently, the estimation of the mutation rate. The study outlines a clear, step-by-step procedure that can be employed to detect true HVs in different organisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.