ArticleEuropean journal of medical research2025
Investigation of adherence to immunosuppressive therapy and perceived social support in organ recipients.
Article in European journal of medical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Psychosocial challenges with transplantation.Current opinion in pulmonary medicine · 2026Review
- Identifying factors contributing to kinesiophobia in kidney transplant patients based on the fear-avoidance model: a qualitative study.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Medication Literacy and Social Support Among Adult Liver Transplant Recipients: A Cross-Sectional Study.Patient preference and adherence · 2026Article
- Analysis of cognitive function trajectories and influencing factors in elderly patients with ischemic stroke: a prospective longitudinal study.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2026Article
- Assessment of Readiness for Discharge and Its Psychosocial Determinants in Kidney and Liver Transplant Patients in Poland-A Cross-Sectional Analytical Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAdherence to immunosuppressive therapy in organ transplant patients is an important factor for the patient's health and the success of the transplant. In this study, we investigated the relationship between the perceived level of social support and adherence to immunosuppressive therapy in post-transplant patients.
methodsThis descriptive and cross-sectional study was conducted with 116 post-transplant liver and kidney transplant recipients. Data were collected using the Personal Information Form, the Multidimensional Perceived Social Support Scale, and the İmmunosuppressive Therapy Adherence Scale (ITAS). Statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics version 30.0, and the significance level was set at p < 0.05.
resultsThe mean age of the participants was 41.52 ± 12.23 years. Of the patients, 62.7% had undergone kidney transplantation and 37.3% had undergone liver transplantation, with the majority (83.9%) receiving organs from living donors. The overall adherence to immunosuppressive therapy was relatively high, with 51.7% of the patients achieving full adherence (ITAS = 12), with a mean ITAS score of 10.22 ± 1.30 (out of 12). A positive and significant relationship was found between adherence to immunosuppressive therapy and perceived level of social support (B = 0.052, p < 0.001).
conclusionsThe importance of social support in the post-transplant period should not be overlooked; in particular, the involvement of family, friends, and other significant individuals should be systematically integrated into patient care. In this context, perceived social support is a practical and feasible strategy for improving adherence to immunosuppressive therapy. Healthcare professionals should routinely assess patients' levels of social support and implement targeted psychosocial interventions for individuals with inadequate support.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.