ArticleBMC complementary medicine and therapies2025
Post-marketing safety evaluation of Guhong Injection: a multicenter, prospective real-world study of 30,000 cases in China.
Article in BMC complementary medicine and therapies, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the incidence, nature, and clinical manifestations of adverse events (AEs) and adverse drug reactions (ADRs) associated with Guhong Injection, and to provide evidence for the safe clinical use of this drug.
methodsA prospective, multicenter, large-scale, registry-based hospital centralized monitoring system was employed to track eligible patients using Guhong Injection across 31 hospitals in China from October 2019 to December 2022.
resultsA total of 30,000 cases were included in the study, with 81 AEs reported, involving 67 patients, yielding an incidence rate of 2.23‰. Of these 67 patients, 60 were first-time users of Guhong Injection, accounting for 89.55% of the AEs. The most common ADR observed was hypersensitivity, with an incidence rate of 1.13‰, primarily presenting as skin itching (0.53‰) and rash (0.43‰). Multifactorial unconditional logistic regression analysis revealed that ethnicity, frequency of drug use, contraindications, and allergic history were significantly associated with the occurrence of AEs.
conclusionThe overall AE rate of Guhong Injection was classified as uncommon according to CIOMS guidelines. Hypersensitivity reactions, particularly skin itching and rash, were the most frequently observed ADRs. Factors such as ethnicity, frequency of drug use, contraindications, and allergic history were identified as contributing to the occurrence of AEs, providing crucial insights for ensuring the safe clinical use of Guhong Injection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.