ReviewEuropean journal of clinical investigation2026
Lipoprotein(a) in clinical practice: Risk stratification and therapeutic strategies.
Review in European journal of clinical investigation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Lipoprotein(a) -Related Cognitive Vulnerability After Stroke Beyond High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein.Translational stroke research · 2026Article
- Lipoprotein(a) is associated with coronary inflammation in people with HIV and undetectable HIV RNA.European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice · 2026Article
- Lipid metabolism at the intersection of rheumatoid arthritis and atherosclerosis.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Lp(a) in Argentina: Regional data reinforce a global risk factor.Atherosclerosis · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundLipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is a primarily genetically determined, causal and independent risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Lp(a) levels are stable, unaffected by lifestyle, and best measured using isoform-insensitive, molar-based assays. Current guidelines from the European Atherosclerosis Society and U.S. National Lipid Association recommend a one-time Lp(a) measurement in all adults. Cascade testing is advised in affected families.
resultsElevated Lp(a) levels are associated with increased risk of coronary artery disease, myocardial infarction incidence and recurrence, and aortic stenosis onset and progression. In cerebrovascular disease, high Lp(a) is linked to large artery ischemic stroke incidence and recurrence, as well as poor functional outcomes. Associations with venous thromboembolism are limited to prothrombotic states and extreme Lp(a) concentrations. Elevated levels (≥50 mg/dL or ≥125 nmol/L) should prompt intensified risk factor modification.
conclusionThere are no currently approved lipid-lowering therapies that substantially reduce Lp(a) levels. Novel agents to lower Lp(a) include antisense oligonucleotides, small interfering ribonucleic acid and small molecules, all of which have shown promising results in phase 2 trials. Ongoing phase 3 trials will evaluate the causal relationship between Lp(a) and ASCVD, and whether lowering Lp(a) reduces cardiovascular outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.